Comparative Study Floor Flexural Behavior of Profiled Steel Sheeting Dry Board between Normal Concrete and Geopolymer Concrete In-Filled

Article Preview

Abstract:

This study investigates the behavior of in-filled materials of profiled steel sheeting dry board (PSSDB) floor system. Two tests were conducted, namely, push-out test to know the connection stiffness and bending test on the PSSDB panel under the influence of different in-filled materials. Result of the push-out test shows that the connection stiffness of the geopolymer concrete-filled PSSDB is 331% higher than that of PSSDB that is filled with normal concrete. This connection stiffness contributed to the reduction of deflection value of 21% in the middle of the midspan for full-board geopolymer concrete in-filled panel bending test. This phenomenon triggered the increase of interaction within the composite system, making the panel that is filled with the geopolymer concrete 25% stronger than the normal concrete–filled panel.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

364-368

Citation:

Online since:

April 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Wright, H.D. & Evans, H. R 1986. Profiled Steel Sheeting for the replacement of Timber Flooring in Building Renovation, SERC Grant GR/D/76875. United Kingdom.

Google Scholar

[2] Mahmood Seraji, W. H. Wan Badaruzzaman, S. A. Osman., 2013. Membrane action in PSSDB floor system. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology. Vol. 8 No. 1 (2013) 57 – 68.

Google Scholar

[3] Wan Badaruzzaman, W. H., Shodiq H.M. and Khalim, A. R., 2002. The Effect of Cocrete Infill and Topping to the Structural Behaviour of Profiled Steel Sheeting Dryboard (PSSDB) Flooring System. Proceeding of 2nd World Engineering Congress: 245-247.

Google Scholar

[4] Shodiq, H.B.M. (2004). Performance of new profiled steel sheeting dry board floor system with concrete infill. PhD. Thesis. Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, UKM.

Google Scholar

[5] MacCaffrey, R. 2002, Climate Change and the cement Industry, Global Cement Lime Journal (Environmental Special Issue), (2002). pp.15-19.

Google Scholar

[6] Davidovits, J., (1994). Geopolymers: Inorganic Polymeric New Materials Engineering, Vol. 16 (2&3), pp.91-139.

Google Scholar

[7] Mohd Mustafa Al Bakri Abdullah, Kamarudin Hussin, Mohammed Bnhussain, Khairul Nizar Ismail, Rafiza Abd Razak, Zarina Yahya 2011 Microstructure Study On Optimization Of High Strength Fly Ash Based Geoplymer. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing GmbH & Co. KG.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.476-478.2173

Google Scholar

[8] Mohd Mustafa Al Bakri Abdullah et. al., 2011. Design Processing And Characterization Of Class Fly Ash – Based Geopolymer. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing GmbH & Co. KG.

Google Scholar

[9] ASTM D 1761-88. 1992. Standard test methods for mechanical fastener in wood. Annual Book of ASTM Standards 15. 08: 195206. American Society for Testing and Materials.

Google Scholar

[10] Dobrowolski, J.A. 1998. Concrete construction handbook, 4th Ed. New York: Mc. Graw-Hill.

Google Scholar