Optimal Manufacturing Cost and Quality Loss by Reciprocal Exponential Cost-Tolerance Function

Article Preview

Abstract:

Specific improvement of a quality of the product and its productivity improvement mainly depend on the designing and fixing of the tolerance of that product. This is done prior to the design stage of the product. Design of tolerance is based on its functional conditions only then its specification for each component in a mechanical system is developed. The finalized tolerance is printed as a drawing (blue print tolerance), inclusive of individual part details, fit and function parameter, critical parameter and design criteria.This paper reveals a new comprehensive and analytical method for fixing an optimal tolerance by worse case limit. This is done to reduce the manufacturing cost and to improve the quality loss of the product by using the expoentional cost function. An example illustrates the proposed model attached with solution method.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1097-1102

Citation:

Online since:

June 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] P. Muthu &V Dhanalakshmi & K Sankaranarayanasamy, Optimal tolerance design of assembly for minimum quality loss and manufacturing cost using metaheuristic algorithms. Int J Adv Manuf Technol, 44 (2009) 1154–1164 DOI 10. 1007/s00170-009-1930-1.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-009-1930-1

Google Scholar

[2] Alain Etienne · Jean-Yves Dantan · Jawad Qureshi ·Ali Siadat, Variation management by functional tolerance allocation and manufacturing process selection. Int J Interact Des Manuf, 2 (2008) 207–218. DOI 10. 1007/s12008-008-0055-3.

DOI: 10.1007/s12008-008-0055-3

Google Scholar

[3] Leandro dos Santos Coelho, Self-organizing migration algorithm applied to machining allocation of clutch assembly Mathematics and Computers in Simulation 80 (2009) 427–435. doi: 10. 1016/j. matcom. 2009. 08. 003.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matcom.2009.08.003

Google Scholar

[4] Chase KW, Greenwood WH, Loosli BG, Hauglund LF, Least cost tolerance allocation for mechanical assemblies with automated process selection. Manuf Rev 3 (1990)49–59.

Google Scholar

[5] . Abhishek Kumar &Seung-Kyum Choi & Lorens Goksel, Tolerance allocation of assemblies using fuzzy comprehensive evaluation and decision support process Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 55 (2011) 379–391.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-010-3047-y

Google Scholar

[6] Siva Kumar M, Stalin B Optimum tolerance synthesis for complex assembly with alternative process selection using Lagrange multiplier method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol (2009) 44: 405– 411.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-008-1866-x

Google Scholar

[7] Wu F, Dantan J-Y, Etienne A, Siadat A, Martin P Improved algorithm for tolerance allocation based on Monte Carlo simulation and discrete optimization. Comput Ind Eng (2009) 56(4): 1402–1413.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2008.09.005

Google Scholar

[8] Muthu P, Dhanalakshmi V, Sankaranarayanasamy K Optimal tolerance design of assembly for minimum quality loss and manufacturing cost using metaheuristic algorithms. Int J Adv Manuf Technol (2009) 44: 1154–1164.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-009-1930-1

Google Scholar

[9] Sivakumar K, Balamurugan C, Ramabalan S Evolutionary sensitivity-based conceptual design and tolerance allocation for mechanical assemblies. Int J Adv Manuf Technol (2010) 48(1–4): 307–324.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-009-2256-8

Google Scholar

[10] Janakiraman V, Saravanan R Concurrent optimization of machining process parameters and tolerance allocation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol (2010) 51(1–4): 357–369.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-010-2602-x

Google Scholar

[11] Sivasubramanian R, Siva Kumar M Optimum tolerance synthesis with process and machine selection for minimizing manufacturing cost and machining time by using genetic algorithm. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Research (2010) 2(1–2): 93–108.

Google Scholar

[12] Cong Lu &Wan-Hua Zhao & Si-Jia Yu Concurrent tolerance design for manufacture and assembly with a game theoretic approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol (2012)62: 303–316.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-011-3783-7

Google Scholar

[13] Heping Peng Concurrent tolerancing for design and manufacturing based on the present worth of quality loss. Int J Adv Manuf Technol(2012) 59: 929–937.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-011-3542-9

Google Scholar

[14] K. Geetha & D. Ravindran & M. Siva Kumar & M. N. Islam Multi-objective optimization for optimum tolerance synthesis with process and machine selection using a genetic algorithm. Int J Adv Manuf Technol (2012).

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-012-4662-6

Google Scholar

[15] M. Siva Kumar & S. M. Kannan & V. Jayabalan A new algorithm for optimum tolerance allocation of complex assemblies with alternative processes selection. Int J Adv Manuf Technol (2009) 40: 819–836.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-008-1389-5

Google Scholar