Effect of Process Parameters on Wear Performance in Abrasive Flow Machining

Article Preview

Abstract:

The wear performance of the mild steel under different Abrasive Flow Machining (AFM) conditions was studied. Wear properties of mild steel are considerably affected by the process parameters of AFM.The effect of extrusion pressure, abrasive concentration and abrasive size during AFM on wear performance were investigated using a reciprocating wear testing machine. Experiments were conducted according to 23 factorial design of experiments for this purpose. The contribution of the process parameters on wear resistance were obtained performing Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). The wear rate, specific wear coefficient (Ks), wear resistance, fatigue strength and surface hardness are also considerably affected by the process parameters abrasive concentration, extrusion pressure and abrasive size.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

661-667

Citation:

Online since:

June 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Chao Zeng , Wei Tian , Wen-He Liao , Liang Hua; Study of laser cladding thermal damage: A quantified micro hardness method, Surface & Coatings Technology 236 (2013) 309–314.

DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2013.10.005

Google Scholar

[2] Ataollah Jayidi, Ulfried Rieger, Wilfried Eichlseder; The effect of machining on the surface integrity and fatigue life, International Journal of fatigue, Volume 30, Issues 10-11, (2008) p.2050-(2055).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2008.01.005

Google Scholar

[3] S. Bagherifard, I. Fernandez-Pariente , R. Ghelichi , M. Guagliano; Effect of severe shot peening on microstructure and fatigue strength of cast iron, International Journal of Fatigue 65 (2014) 64–70.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2013.08.022

Google Scholar

[4] Hiroyuki Sasahara ; The effect on fatigue life of residual stress and surface hardness resulting from different cutting conditions of 0. 45%C steel, International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture 45 (2005) 131–136.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2004.08.002

Google Scholar

[5] Jose Cherian, Jeoju M Issac; Fatigue performance in Abrasive Flow Machining, Applied Mechanics and Materials Vols. 592-594 (2014) pp.354-362.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.592-594.354

Google Scholar

[6] K.R. Sriraman 1, S. Ganesh Sundara Raman , S.K. Seshadri; Influence of crystallite size on the hardness and fatigue life of steel samples coated with electrodeposited Nano crystalline Ni–W alloys. Materials Letters 61 (2007) 715–718.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2006.05.049

Google Scholar

[7] Hao Wu, Shigeru Hamada , Hiroshi Noguchi ; Fatigue strength characteristics evaluation of SUH660 considering small fatigue crack propagation behavior and hardness distribution. International Journal of Fatigue 63 (2014) 1–11.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2013.12.011

Google Scholar