Influence of Process Parameter on Microstructural Characteristics and Tensile Properties of Friction Welded ASS304L Alloy

Article Preview

Abstract:

The rotary type continuous friction welding process is a solid state joining process by mechanically. It produces a joint in the forging pressure contact with rotating and motionless workpiece. The solid state joining process it produces welds with reduced distortion and improved mechanical properties. The austenitic stainless steels are widely used in shipbuilding field, nuclear field and automobile field because of their special mechanical and metallurgical properties. In this work, friction welding of austenitic stainless steel rods of 10mm diameter was investigated with an aim to understand the influence of friction welding process parameters. The details of microstructure analysis using optical microscopy are discussed.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

745-750

Citation:

Online since:

June 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Maalekian M. Characterization and Optimization of orbital Friction welding- critical assessment of literature, Sci Technol Weld Join 2007; 12(8): 738-759.

Google Scholar

[2] Mumin Sahin. Joining with friction welding of high-speed steel and medium-carbon steel. J Mater Process Technol 2005; 168: 202-210.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.11.015

Google Scholar

[3] Giililand RG. The behaviour of welded joints in stainless and alloy steels at elevated temperatures, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Atomic Energy Commission Contract, U.S. AEC Rep. ORNL 1982; 4781.

Google Scholar

[4] Ahlblom B, Sandström, R. Hot workability of stainless steels: influence of deformation parameters, microstructural components, and restoration processes. Int Metals Rev 1982; 27(1): 1-27.

DOI: 10.1179/imr.1982.27.1.1

Google Scholar

[5] Kamachi Mudali U. Ananda Rao BM, Shanmugam K, Natarajan R, Baldev Raj. Corrosion and microstructural aspects of dissimilar joints of titanium and type 304L stainless steel, J Nucl Mater 2003; 321: 40-48.

DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3115(03)00194-6

Google Scholar

[6] Brinkman CR, Korth GE, and Beeston JM. Comparison of the strain controlled low cycle fatigue behaviour of type 304/308 weld and base material. Proc Int Conf on Creep and Fatigue in Elevated Temperature Applications, Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Philadelphia, London 1974; C218(73): 218. 1-218. 11.

DOI: 10.2172/4462657

Google Scholar

[7] Gunaraj V, Murugan N. Application of response surface methodology for predicting weld bead quality in submerged arc welding of pipes. J Mater Process Technol 1999; 88: 266-75.

DOI: 10.1016/s0924-0136(98)00405-1

Google Scholar

[8] Balasubramanian M, Jayabalan V, Balasubramanian V. Developing mathematical models to predict tensile properties of pulsed current gas tungsten arc welded Ti-6Al-4V alloy. Mater Des 2008; 29(1): 92-7.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2006.12.001

Google Scholar

[9] Mahendran G, Balasubramanian V, Senthilvelan T. Developing diffusion bonding windows for joining AZ31B magnesium–AA2024 aluminium alloys. Mater Des 2009; 30: 1240-4.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2008.06.015

Google Scholar

[10] Lee D J, Byun J C, Sung J H, Lee H W. The dependence of crack properties on the Cr/Ni equivalent ratio in AISI 304L austenitic stainless steel weld metals. Mat Sci Eng. 2009; 513-514: 154-159.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2009.01.049

Google Scholar

[11] Dey HC, Ashfaq M, Bhaduri AK, Prasad Rao K. Joining of titanium to 304L stainless steel by friction welding. J Mater Process Technol 2009; 209: 5862-5870.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2009.06.018

Google Scholar