The Optimization of Thermal Pre-Treatment Time for Extracellular Polymeric Substances Extraction from Sewage Sludge

Article Preview

Abstract:

This study aims to find out the optimum extraction time varied from 5 min to 60 min for extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) from sewage sludge pretreated at 80 °C. The change of the contents of EPS and its components under different time limit were recorded and compared. The results showed: the contents of soluble protein, TOC, soluble sugar and DNA was increased by 579.17 mg/l, 514.25 mg/l, 132.79 mg/l, and 34.69 mg/l, respectively, with the increase of thermal pre-treatment time during the process, and the DNA content increased the least, which indicating that the effect of thermal pre-treatment at 80 °C on cell lysis of sewage sludge was small. The EPS content, as a whole, was increased with the increase of thermal pre-treatment time. By analyzing the experimental data with the Analytic Hierarchy Process Model, which was used to identify the optimum thermal pre-treatment time of extracting EPS, the results showed that the effectiveness of EPS extraction from sludges was 30 min>60 min>50 min>20 min>40 min>10 min>5 min. Therefore, the 30 min was choosed as the optimum thermal pre-treatment time.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

496-505

Citation:

Online since:

June 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Tian Y. Behaviour of bacterial extracellular polymeric substances from activated sludge: a review, J. Int. J. Environ. Pollut. 32(2008)78-89.

Google Scholar

[2] Yu G H, He P J, Shao L M, et al. Extracellular proteins, polysaccharides and enzymes impact on sludge aerobic digestion after ultrasonic pretreatment, J. Water Research. 42(2008)1925-(1934).

DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2007.11.022

Google Scholar

[3] Higgins M J, Novak J T. Dewatering and settling of activated sludges: The case for using cation analysis, J. Water Environment Research. 69(1997) 225-232.

DOI: 10.2175/106143097x125380

Google Scholar

[4] Novak J T, Becker H, Zurow A. Factors influencing activated sludge properties, J. Journal of the Environmental Engineering Division. 103(1977) 815-828.

DOI: 10.1061/jeegav.0000679

Google Scholar

[5] Abzac P D, Bordas F, Van Hulllebusch E, et al. Extraction of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) from anaerobic granular sludges: comparison of chemical and physical extraction protocols, J. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 85(2010).

DOI: 10.1007/s00253-009-2288-x

Google Scholar

[6] Ge Li-yun, Wang Hong-wu, Ma Lu-ming, Li Xiao-yan. Optimization of extraction process of extracellular polymeric substances by physics method, J. Environmental Chemistry. 25(2006) 722-725. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[7] Long Teng-rui, Li Jin-yin, Long Xiang-yu, Luo Tai-zhong, Tang Ran. Extracting extracellular polymer substances from the activated sludge using ultrasonic, J. Environmental Chemistry. 27(2008) 310-313. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[8] Liu Xiang, Huang Ying-en, Liu Yan, Dai Rui-hua. The comparison of effectiveness of different methods in extracting extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) from biofilm and activated sludge, J. Journal of Fudan University (Natural Science). 50(2011).

Google Scholar

[9] Li Xiu-fen et al. Correlation between extracellular polymeric substances and aerobic biogranulation in membrane bioreactor, J. Separation and Purification Technology. 59(2008) 26-33.

DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2007.05.024

Google Scholar

[10] Liu Y, Lam M C, Fang H H P. Adsorption of heavy metals by EPS of activated sludge, J. Wat Sci Tech, 2001, 43(6): 59-66.

DOI: 10.2166/wst.2001.0340

Google Scholar

[11] M. Dubois, K.A. Gilles, J.K. Hamilton, P.A. Rebers, F. Smith, Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances, J. Anal. Chem. 28 (1956) 350–356.

DOI: 10.1021/ac60111a017

Google Scholar

[12] E.F. Hartree, Determination of protein: a modification of the Lowry method that gives the linear photometric response, J. Anal. Biochem. 48 (1972) 422–427.

DOI: 10.1016/0003-2697(72)90094-2

Google Scholar

[13] Y.D. Sun, K.D. Clinkenbeard, C. Clarke, L. Cudd, S.K. Highlander, S.M. Dabo, Pasteurella haemolytica leukotoxin induced apoptosis of bovine lymphocytes involves DNA fragmentation, J. Vet. Microbiol. 65 (1999) 153–166.

DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1135(98)00286-7

Google Scholar

[14] Sunil S, Lee D J. Extraction of extracellular polymeric substances from aerobic granule with compact interior structure, J. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 154(2008) 1120-1126.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.11.058

Google Scholar

[15] Sunil S, Lee D J, Lai J Y. Effects of aeration intensity on formation of phenol-fed aerobic granules and extracellular polymeric substances, J. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 77(2007) 175-182.

DOI: 10.1007/s00253-007-1125-3

Google Scholar

[16] Liu Y, Fang H H P. Influence of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) on flocculation, settling, and dewatering of activated sludge, J. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology. 33(2003)237-273.

DOI: 10.1080/10643380390814479

Google Scholar

[17] Xiaomeng Han, Zhiwei Wang, Chaowei Zhu, Zhichao Wu, Effect of ultrasonic power density on extracting loosely bound and tightly bound extracellular polymeric substances, J. Desalination. 329 (2013)35-40.

DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2013.09.002

Google Scholar

[18] Brown M J, Lester J N. Comparison of bacterial extracellular polymer extraction methods, J. Applied Environmental Microbiology. 40(1980) 179-185.

DOI: 10.1128/aem.40.2.179-185.1980

Google Scholar

[19] T. L. Saaty. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill Company, (1980).

Google Scholar

[20] T. L. Saaty. Decision Making – The Analytic Hierarchy and Network Processes (AHP/ANP), J. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering. 13 (2004)1-35.

DOI: 10.1007/s11518-006-0151-5

Google Scholar

[21] T. L. Saaty. A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures, J Journal of Mathematical Psychology. 15(1977) 234-281.

DOI: 10.1016/0022-2496(77)90033-5

Google Scholar