3-D CFD Simulation of the Airflow over a Gable Roof with Different Elevations

Article Preview

Abstract:

The pressure coefficients on duo-pitched roofs of separated buildings are well described by several standards. Nowadays, there are various commercial or non-commercial programs which can predict the pressure coefficients. However, the most accurate method is to perform a wind tunnel test. The aim of this paper is to simulate the airflow over a gable roof with different elevations under ANSYS Fluent 14.0 program. Examined elevations of the gable roof are 5°, 15° and 30°. Classical two equation k-ε turbulence models based on Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations simulation were performed. Performance of each turbulence model with the increasing angel of the roof was compared.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

229-234

Citation:

Online since:

June 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] J. Kala, M. Bajer, J. Barnat, R. Karasek, O. Kratochvil, A. Pechal, Determination of the air flow induced cyclic stressing of a bridge structure, in: EUROSTEEL 2011, August, 2011, Budapest, Hungary, pp.1353-1359.

Google Scholar

[2] R. Cajka, M. Krejsa, J. Melcer, The effects of wind and reliability assessment cladding for industrial buildings in Nošovice, in: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Dynamics of Civil Engineering and Transport Structures and Wind Engineering, May 30-June 2, 2011, Jasna pod Chopkom, Slovakia, pp.19-22.

Google Scholar

[3] EN 1991-1–4. Eurocode 4: Actions on structures, Part 1–4: General actions – Wind actions, (2005).

DOI: 10.1680/dgte1.31524

Google Scholar

[4] Ansys Fluent 14. 0 – User's guide, Fluent Inc., (2011).

Google Scholar

[5] B. Taraba, Z. Michalec, V. Michalcova, M. Bojko, M. Kozubkova, CFD simulations of the effect of wind on the spontaneous heating of coal stockpiles, in: Fuel, Vol. 118, 2014, pp.107-112.

DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2013.10.064

Google Scholar

[6] I. Oleksakova, O. Hubova, Comparison of Various Turbulence Models, in: 13th International scientific conference VSU´2013, June 6-7, 2013, L. Karavelov Civil engineering higher school Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria, pp.145-149.

Google Scholar

[7] H. Irtaza, R. G. Beale, M. H. R. Godley, A. Jameel, Comparison of wind pressure measurements on Silsoe experimental building from full-scale observation, wind-tunnel experiments and various CFD techniques, in: International Journal of Engineering, Science and Technology, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2013, pp.28-41.

DOI: 10.4314/ijest.v5i1.3

Google Scholar

[8] I. Abohela, N. Hamza, S. Dudek, Validating CFD Simulation Results: Wind flow around a surface mounted cube in a turbulent channel flow, PLEA2012 - 28th Conference, Opportunities, Limits & Needs Towards an environmentally responsible architecture, November 7-9, 2012, Lima, Peru.

Google Scholar