Comparison of Distribution Methods of Low Flow Analysis for Bandar Segamat, Johor

Article Preview

Abstract:

During the monsoon season, certain areas in Malaysia are experiencing a flood. While during the transition period Malaysia is experiencing a drought. This phenomenon could lead to severe disaster and precaution monitoring is needed to avoid this occurrences. Low flow during the dry season could lead to several negative effects on the river ecosystem. Thus, this study was conducted to determine the low flow frequency and intensity for the Segamat city. The duration for 2 years to 100 years based on the previous 20 years of stream flow data were used to calculated. Stream flow data were obtained from the Department of Irrigation and Drainage (DID). Two prominent distribution analyses methods known as Gumbel Distribution and Log pearson Type III Distribution were applied. The distribution results were validated using Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and California method and Weibull method are selected. Based on the analyses results, it clearly shows that the distibution of low flow are between 1 m3/s to 10 m3/s. The flow are significantly correlate with the rainfall intensity. RMSE was selected based on the lowest value of 0.721 for the Gumble Distribution and 1.831 for Log Pearson Type III Distribution. Chi-square test shows a good agreement for Gumble Distribution (7.615<12.59) and Log Pearson Type III(5.201<11.07) using 5% significant level. The confident level form both tests are valid (p>0.05), thus, this results could be used for further analyses to alleviate the low flow in the study area.

You have full access to the following eBook

Info:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Malaysia Meteorological Department. 2006. Report on heavy rainfall that caused flood in Johor, Melaka, Negeri Sembilan and Pahang during the period 17th -20th December (2006).

Google Scholar

[2] Mohammad Mahdavi, Khaled Osati, Sayed Ali Naghi Sadeghi, Bakhtiar Karimi & Jalil Mobaraki. Determining suitable Probability Distribution Models for annual Precipitation Data (A Case study of Mazandaran and Golestan Provinces), Journal of Sustainable Development, Vol. 3, No. 1 March 2010, pp.159-168.

DOI: 10.5539/jsd.v3n1p159

Google Scholar

[3] Chow, V.T., Maidment, D.R. & Mays, L. W. (1988). Applied Hydrology. McGraw-Hill, New York, NY.

Google Scholar

[4] John Risley, Adam Stonewall & Tana Haluska. Estimate Flow Duration and Low Flow Frequency statistics for Unregulated Streams in Oregon, USGS-science for changing world, Scientific Investigation Report 2008-5126, Version 1. 1, June (2009).

DOI: 10.3133/sir20085126

Google Scholar

[5] Muhammad Barzani Gasim, Salmijah Surif, Mazlin Mokhtar, Mohd. Ekhwan Hj Toriman, Sahibin Abd Rahim & Chong Huei Bee. Analisis Banjir Disember 2006: Tumpuan di Kawasan Bandar Segamat, Johor, Sains Malaysiana 39(3)(2010), pp: 353-361.

Google Scholar

[6] The Environment Agency Publication, Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management Research and Development, Fluvia Design Guide-Chapter 2, access on January 2014 at website www. evidence. environment-agency. gov. uk.

Google Scholar

[7] Soh Bing Zheng. Low Flow Analysis-A Comparison between Gumble and Log Pearson Type III Methods, Tesis Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, April (2010).

Google Scholar

[8] Gerald Keller. Statistic for Management and Economics, Critical Value of Chi-Square Distribution Table, Appendix B-11, (2012).

Google Scholar

[9] Diong Jeong Yik, Subramaniam Moten, Munirah Arrifin and Siva Shangari Govidan. Trends in Intensity and Frequency of Precipitation Extremes in Malaysia from 1951 to 2009. Malaysia Meteorology Department Research Paper, (2013).

Google Scholar

[10] Ahmad Syukri Mohd Nasir. Kajian Banjir di Sungai Muar, Tesis Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, April (2008).

Google Scholar

[11] J.M. Fallot. Efficiency of Gumble Analyses for Determining Extreme Daily Prepatation in Switzerland. Quartier Doriginy, CH-1015, (2012).

Google Scholar

[12] Stacey J. Shaefer Louis Theodore. Probability and Statistics Applications for Environmental Science, (2007).

Google Scholar