Effect of Liquid Flow Rate and Amine Concentration on CO2 Removal from Natural Gas at High Pressure Operation in Packed Absorption Column

Article Preview

Abstract:

Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions such as carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) from oil and natural gas operation at offshore platforms have significant contribution to global warming. The reduction of these GHG emissions is possible through CO2 capture technology. This study reports the absorption performance of monoethanolamine (MEA) for the removal of CO2 from natural gas (NG) at high pressure conditions. The absorption experiments were performed in an absorption column packed with Sulzer Metal Gauze Packing at 5.0 MPa operating pressure. The absorption performance was evaluated in terms of CO2 removal (%) with liquid flow rate ranging from 1.81 to 4.51 m3/m2.h and MEA concentration of 1.0 - 4.0 kmol/m3. It was found that CO2 removal (%) had increased with increasing liquid flow rate and MEA concentration.

You have full access to the following eBook

Info:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] J. Kearns, K. Armstrong, L. Shirvill, E. Garland, C. Simon, J. Monopolis, Flaring & venting in the oil & gas exploration & production industry, International Association of Oil & Gas Producers (OGP), (2000).

Google Scholar

[2] A. Aroonwilas, P. Tontiwachwuthikul, Mass transfer coefficients and correlation for CO2 absorption into 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol (AMP) using structured packing, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 37 (1998) 569-575.

DOI: 10.1021/ie970482w

Google Scholar

[3] A. Aroonwilas, P. Tontiwachwuthikul, High-efficiency structured packing for CO2 separation using 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol (AMP), Sep. Purif. Techol., 12 (1997) 67-79.

DOI: 10.1016/s1383-5866(97)00037-3

Google Scholar

[4] A. Aroonwilas, P. Tontiwachwuthikul, A. Chakma, Effects of operating and design parameters on CO2 absorption in columns with structured packings, Sep. Purif. Technol., 24 (2001) 403-411.

DOI: 10.1016/s1383-5866(01)00140-x

Google Scholar

[5] A. Dey, A. Aroonwilas, CO2 absorption into MEA-AMP blend: Mass transfer and absorber height index, Energy Procedia, 1 (2009) 211-215.

DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2009.01.030

Google Scholar

[6] K. Fu, T. Sema, Z. Liang, H. Liu, Y. Na, H. Shi, R. Idem, P. Tontiwachwuthikul, Investigation of Mass-Transfer Performance for CO2 Absorption into Diethylenetriamine (DETA) in a Randomly Packed Column, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 51 (2012) 12058-12064.

DOI: 10.1021/ie300830h

Google Scholar

[7] A. Naami, M. Edali, T. Sema, R. Idem, P. Tontiwachwuthikul, Mass Transfer Performance of CO2 Absorption into Aqueous Solutions of 4-Diethylamino-2-butanol, Monoethanolamine, and N-Methyldiethanolamine, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 51 (2012) 6470-6479.

DOI: 10.1021/ie2008357

Google Scholar

[8] T. Sema, A. Naami, P. Usubharatana, X. Wang, R. Gao, Z. Liang, R. Idem, P. Tontiwachwuthikul, Mass transfer of CO2 absorption in hybrid MEA-methanol solvents in packed column, Energy Procedia, 37 (2013) 883-889.

DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2013.05.181

Google Scholar

[9] A. Setameteekul, A. Aroonwilas, A. Veawab, Statistical factorial design analysis for parametric interaction and empirical correlations of CO2 absorption performance in MEA and blended MEA/MDEA processes, Sep. Purif. Technol., 64 (2008) 16-25.

DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2008.09.002

Google Scholar

[10] Y. Artanto, J. Jansen, P. Pearson, G. Puxty, A. Cottrell, E. Meuleman, P. Feron, Pilot-scale evaluation of AMP/PZ to capture CO2 from flue gas of an Australian brown coal–fired power station, Int. J. Greenhouse Gas Control, 20 (2014) 189-195.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijggc.2013.11.002

Google Scholar

[11] K. Maneeintr, R.O. Idem, P. Tontiwachwuthikul, A.G.H. Wee, Comparative Mass Transfer Performance Studies of CO2 Absorption into Aqueous Solutions of DEAB and MEA, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 49 (2010) 2857-2863.

DOI: 10.1021/ie900540v

Google Scholar