Effect of Geotextile Encapsulation on Lime Column Axial Stress in Pontain Marine Clay

Article Preview

Abstract:

Previous researchers reported that problematic soft clay can be improved by deep lime stabilization. However, due to low confining pressure of surrounding soil, problems often occurred at top part of column which reduced the performance of lime column, such as: crushing at column head and higher settlement for surrounding soil at the upper part of column. Geotextile encapsulated lime column (GELC) was proposed in this study. The stresses on column are essential in the analysis on columnar improved soil. Multi-stage loading test was conducted on lime column and GELC stabilized Pontian marine clay aged 14 days, 28 days and 56 days in order to investigate axial stress on lime column and GELC stabilized Pontian marine clay. Geotextile encapsulation increased the compressive strength of lime column about 70 percent at axial strain of 8 percent.

You have full access to the following eBook

Info:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] S. Glendinning, C. Rogers, Deep: Stabilisation Using Lime, Thomas Telford, London, (1996).

Google Scholar

[2] Coastal Development Institute of Technology: The Deep Mixing Method Principle, Design and Construction, A. A. Balkema, Tokyo, (2002).

Google Scholar

[3] B. B. Broms: Lime and lime/cement columns, in: K. Kirsch (Ed. ), Ground Improvement, Spon Press, 2004, pp.252-330.

DOI: 10.4324/9780203305201_chapter_8

Google Scholar

[4] K. Kitsugi, R. Azakami: Lime column techniques for the improvement of clay ground, Proceedings of Symposium on Recent Developments in Ground Improvement Techniques, Bangkok(1982).

Google Scholar

[5] G. Zheng, X. L. Gu, X. L. Xiang: Research on the mechanism of load transfer for cement-soil piles, Chinese Journal of Civil Engineering. 35(5) (2002) 82-86.

Google Scholar

[6] M. Olsson, T. Edstam, C. Alén: Some experiences from full-scale test embankments on floating lime-cement columns, in: M. Kartunen, M. Leoni (Eds. ), Geotechnics of Soft Soils: Focus on Ground Improvement, Taylor & Francis Group, London, pp. (2009).

DOI: 10.1201/9780203883334.ch8

Google Scholar

[7] J. Gniel, A. Bouazza: Improvement of soft soils using geogrid encased stone columns, Geotextile and Geomembrane. 27 (2009) 167-175.

DOI: 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2008.11.001

Google Scholar

[8] S. Murugesan, K. Rajagopal: Model tests on geosynthetic-encased stone columns, Geosynthetics International. (2007) 346-354.

DOI: 10.1680/gein.2007.14.6.346

Google Scholar

[9] C. S. Wu, Y. S. Hong: Laboratory tests on geosynthetic-encapsulated sand columns, Geotextiles and Geomembranes. (2009) 107–120.

DOI: 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2008.09.003

Google Scholar

[10] M. Alamgir, N. Miura, M. R. Madhav: Analysis of granular column reinforced ground-1: estimation of interaction shear stresses, Saga, Japan(1993).

Google Scholar

[11] H. B. Poorooshasb, G. G. Meyerhof: Analysis of behaviour of stone columns and lime columns, Computers and Geotechnics. 20(1) (1997) 47-70.

DOI: 10.1016/s0266-352x(96)00013-4

Google Scholar

[12] S. Y. Chong and K. A. Kassim: Consolidation Characteristics of Lime Column and Geotextile Encapsulated Lime Column (GELC) Stabilized Pontian Marine Clay, The Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering. 19 Bund A (2014) 129-141.

DOI: 10.11113/jt.v77.6388

Google Scholar