A Quantitative Review on Acceptance of Silent Piling Technology Among Designers in Malaysia

Abstract:

Normally, the conventional method of piling that uses percussion, vibration or bored piles is less environmental friendly and may contributes to environmental problems. The study was conducted in order to identify the potential of silent piling technology for sustainable implementation. In addition, it is also useful to evaluate the acceptance of this technology and the level of technical knowledge among the engineers who are involved in construction industry, especially in Malaysia. Quantitative research using questionnaires was considered for this study in order to gain relevant information. The questionnaire was distributed to 43 companies that are registered under ACEM (Association of Consulting Engineers Malaysia). The result shows that there is a great potential for silent piling technology in Malaysia. The technology is accepted among designers at the highest level. Meanwhile, the technical knowledge regarding silent piling technology is also at the highest level. In addition, the result also shows that Press-in technology is highly recommended for the construction industry for sustainable implementation. In conclusion, it is hope that suggestions and strategies can be synergized so that sustainable technology, such as Press-in technology, is applied in Malaysia. The technology is not only useful for the designer, but also the industry, local authorities and universities.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 773-774)
• Pages: 1471-1475
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.773-774.1471
• Online since: July 2015
• Authors: Zaiton Ibrahim*, Nor Azizi Yusoff, Suliadi Firdaus Sufahani, Nur Abidah Azhar
• Keywords: Acceptance among Designers, Quantitative Research, Silent Piling Technology

References

[1] Ministry of the Environment Government of Japan, Quality of the Environment in Japan 1996, White Paper, Part II, 1996: http: /www. env. go. jp/en/, (1999).

[2] M. Motoyama, T.L. Goh. Press-in Piling Technology: Development and Current Practice, Advances in Deep Foundations: London, (2007).

[3] Tolossa, Degefa. Combining Household Qualitative Data And Quantitative Data In Food Security Research., Innovation creativity, (2005).

[4] T. Richard. Qualitative versus Quantitative Methods: Understanding Why Qualitative Methods are Superior for Criminology and Criminal Justice., Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Criminology, (2009).

[5] John W. C. Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches., SAGE Publications, (2003).

[6] Best J.W., Kahn J.K., Research in Education, United States of America: Pearson, (2006).

[7] Patton M., Qualitative Evaluation and Research Method, , Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, (pp.169-186) (1990).