An Investigation on the Effect of Calcite Bacteria Seeding on Shear Strength of Peat Soil via an Unconfined Compression Test

Abstract:

Peat soils have been known for their problematic characteristics which include high water content, high compressibility and low shear strength. In this study, an attempt was made to investigate the effect of 1 week addition of modified Urea-CaCl₂ liquid medium with and without Sporosarcina pasteurii on the shear strength of unsterilized dried peat soil using the Unconfined Compression Test. After the treatment period, significant increase in the shear strength of the soil was found to be highest for peat + medium at 42 kN/m², moderate for peat + medium + Sporosarcina pasteurii at 27 kN/m² and unchanged for peat + water control at 24 kN/m². Although the growth dynamics of all the microbes involved in the calcite formation in the treated peat soil were not known, the addition of the modified Urea-CaCl₂ liquid medium into the soil clearly had contributed to the marked increased in the shear strength of the soil. It is probable that the medium had promoted a better growth of indigenous calcite bacteria population in the soil which may have been suppressed by the slow growing S. pasteurii population being added daily to the soil

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 773-774)
• Pages: 1513-1517
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.773-774.1513
• Online since: July 2015
• Authors: Norbaya Sidek*, S. Abdul-Talib, N. Mohd Zain, N.R.N.A. Rashid, I.A. Abu Bakar
• Keywords: Engineering Properties, Microbiological Work, Peat Soils, Physical Properties, Soil Treatment, Unconfined Compression Test

References

[1] M. Abdul Wahed, Effects of organic content on consolidation parameters of peat soil, Faculty of Civil Engineering, 1, (2005) 1-12.

[2] B.K. Bujang, Experimental investigation on Geomechanical properties of tropical organic soils and peat, American J. of Engineering and Applied Science 2, 1, (2009) 184-188.

DOI: 10.3844/ajeassp.2009.184.188

[3] S. Castanier, G. Le Metayer-Levrel, and J.P. Perthuisot, Carbonates precipitation and limestone genesis – the microbiologist point of view, Geol, 126, (1999) 9-23.

DOI: 10.1016/s0037-0738(99)00028-7

[4] R.L. Crawford, M.B. Burbank, T.J. Weaver, B.C. Williams, United States Patent Application Publication, Pub. No.: US2011/0027850 (2011).

[5] J.T. Dejong, M.B. Fritzges, and K. Nusslein, Microbially induced cementation to control sand response to undrained shear, ASCE J. Geotech. Geoenviron, 132 (11), (2006) 1381-1392.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1090-0241(2006)132:11(1381)

[6] W. de Muynck, D. Debrower, N. De Belie, and W. Verstraete, Microbial carbonate precipitation improves the durability of cementatious materials, Cement and Concrete Res., 38, (2008) 1005-1014.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2008.03.005

[7] F. Hammes, , N. Boon, J. de Villiers, and S.D. Siciliano, Strain specific ureolytic calcium carbonate precipitation, Applied and Environmental Microbiology, (2003) 4901-4909.

DOI: 10.1128/aem.69.8.4901-4909.2003

[8] V. Ramakrishnan, K. Ramesh, and S.S. Bang, Improvement of concrete durability by bacterial mineral precipitation, Proc. ICF 11, (2005) 9736.

[9] D. Sarda, H.S. Choonia, D.D. Sarode, and S.S. LeLe, Biocalcification by Bacillus pasteurii urease: a novel application, Journal Of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology, 36(8), (2009) 1111-5.

DOI: 10.1007/s10295-009-0581-4