Comparative Study of Small Office Layout Based on Amount of Communication and Knowledge Creation Behavior

Abstract:

The increasing use of electronically mediated communication among workers when dealing with collocated group members has become unavoidable. Besides, communication is a vital part of sustainability strategy of an organization in order to keep abreast with business agility, as well as increasing organization’s intellectual productivity. However, the importance of physical workplace as a place supporting face to face communication cannot be denied since it is one of the factors of successful accomplishment of complex group tasks and activities. In this paper, we explored and compared the characteristics of two small office layout and physical settings on group’s communication while performing their work process – in this case we adopted SECI Model behaviors. The ethnographic and cross-sectional studies were conducted, and relationship between physical design, communication and work process have been explored by considering the office layout of two project groups at research institution in Japan. The findings highlighted the differences in distribution of amount of communication in these two layouts based on several measurements such as communication contents, unit boundaries, SECI behaviors and so on. Based on the result of the study, we suggest the layout and physical settings that foster communicative workplace as well as supporting their work process.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 773-774)
• Pages: 789-793
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.773-774.789
• Online since: July 2015
• Authors: Azizah Md Ajis*, Shin Muramatsu, Ryusuke Naka
• Keywords: Amount of Communication, Office Layout, SECI Model, Workplace Design

References

[1] S. Murakami, Chitekiseisansei Kenkyu no Susume, in Kenchiku to ChitekiSeisansei, 2010, p.8–15.

[2] H. Takai, Three-tier Model of Intellectual Productivity, in Kenchiku to Chitekiseisansei - Chiei o Souzosuru Kenchiku, 2010, p.16–23.

[3] A. Mori, K. Tsunekawa, A. Kato, and P. C. Le Roux, A study on relationships among plan compositions, work-styles and communication behaviors in office, J. Archit. Planning, Environ. Eng. AIJ, vol. 551, p.129–134, (2002).

DOI: 10.3130/aija.67.129_1

[4] J. B. Stryker, M. D. Santoro, G. F. Farris, and S. Member, Creating Collaboration Opportunity : Designing the Physical Workplace to Promote High-Tech Team Communication, IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag., vol. 59, no. 4, p.609–620, (2012).

DOI: 10.1109/tem.2011.2170995

[5] R. Appel-Meulenbroek, Knowledge sharing through co-presence: added value of facilities, Facilities, vol. 28, no. 3/4, p.189–205, (2010).

DOI: 10.1108/02632771011023140

[6] M. J. Hatch, Physical barriers, task characteristics and interaction activity in research and development firm, Adm. Sci. Q., vol. 32, p.387–399, (1987).

[7] V. W. Kupritz and T. Hillsman, The Impact of the Physical Environment on Supervisory Communication Skills Transfer, J. Bus. Commun., vol. 48, no. 2, p.148–185, Mar. (2011).

DOI: 10.1177/0021943610397269

[8] K. Sailer, Creativity as social and spatial process, Facilities, vol. 29, no. 1/2, p.6–18, (2011).

[9] C. Greene and J. Myerson, Space for thought: designing for knowledge workers, Facilities, vol. 29, no. 1/2, p.19–30, (2011).

DOI: 10.1108/02632771111101304

[10] B. P. Haynes, The impact of the behavioural environment on office productivity, J. Facil. Manag., vol. 5, no. 3, p.158–171, (2007).

[11] D. Kobayashi and Y. Yanagisawa, Office ni Okeru Communication Kuukan no Kousei to Tsukawarekata/ Hyouka ni kansuru Kenkyu, Archit. Inst. Japan, vol. 5224, no. Hokuriku, p.447–448, (2002).

[12] Y. Midorikawa, T. Ikaga, H. Sato, and T. Warita, Office no Kenchiku Kuukan to Communication ga Chitekiseisansei ni Ataeru Eikyou, Archit. Inst. Japan, vol. 4038, no. Kanto, p.149–152, (2010).

[13] G. Von Krogh, K. Ichijo, and I. Nonaka, Enabling Knowledge Creation - How to Unlock the Mystery of Tcit Knowledge and Release the Power of Innovation. 2000, p.1–292.

DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195126167.003.0004

[14] I. Nonaka and H. Takeuchi, The Knowledge Creating Company. 1995, p.1–295.

[15] J. B. Stryker and M. D. Santoro, Facilitating Face-to-Face Communication in High-Tech Teams, Res. Manag., vol. 55, no. 1, p.51–56, Jan. (2012).

DOI: 10.5437/08956308x5501013

[16] NOPA, Creative Office Report V. 2. 0, New Off. Promot. Assoc., vol. 2, p.1–47, (2008).