Performance Comparison of 12S-14P Inner and Outer Rotor Field Excitation Flux Switching Motor

Article Preview

Abstract:

Hybrid excitation flux switching machines (HEFSMs) have a several advantages such as robust rotor structure, high torque and power capabilities, and high efficiency suitable for light load and heavy industry applications. However, the general structure of HEFSMs employed with three main flux sources namely permanent magnet (PM), field excitation coil (FEC) and armature coil located on the stator body causes high manufacturing cost. Therefore, a new non-PM field excitation flux switching machine (FEFSM) consists of rugged rotor structure suitable for high-speed operation with capability to keep similar torque and power density of HEFSM is proposed and examined. In this paper, performances of both outer and inner rotor 12S-14P FEFSMs are analyzed and compared. As conclusion, the inner-rotor topology provides much higher torque and power when compared with outer rotor configuration.

You have full access to the following eBook

Info:

[1] Z. Q. Zhu and D. Howe, Electrical machines and drives for electric, hybrid, and fuel cell vehicles, Proc. IEEE, 95(2007) 746-765.

DOI: 10.1109/jproc.2006.892482

Google Scholar

[2] Y. Amara, E. Hoang, M. Gabsi, and M. Lecrivain, Design and comparison of different flux-switching synchronous machines for an aircraft oil breather application, Euro. Trans Electr. Powe, 15 (2005) 497-511.

DOI: 10.1002/etep.85

Google Scholar

[3] E. Sulaiman, T. Kosaka, and N Matsui, High power density design of 6slot-8pole hybrid excitation flux switching machine for hybrid electric vehicles, IEEE Trans. on Magn. 47 (2011) 4453-4456.

DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2011.2140315

Google Scholar

[4] C. Pollock and M. Brackley, Comparison of the acoustic noise of flux-switching and switched reluctance drive, IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., 39 (2003) 826-834.

DOI: 10.1109/tia.2003.810626

Google Scholar

[5] W. Xu, J. Zhu, Y. Zhang, Y. Wang, Y. Li, and J. Hu, Flux-switching permanent magnet machine drive system for plug-in hybrid electrical vehicle, Proc. of IEEE Conf. on Australian Universities Power Engineering (AUPEC), (2010) 1-6.

Google Scholar

[6] J.T. Chen and Z.Q. Zhu, Winding configuration and optimal stator rotor pole combination of flux-switching PM brushless machines, IEEE Trans. on Energy Conversion, 25 (2010) 293-302.

DOI: 10.1109/tec.2009.2032633

Google Scholar

[7] Y. Wang and Z. Deng, Comparison of hybrid excitation topologies for flux-switching machines, IEEE Trans. on Magn., 48 (2012) 2518-2527.

DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2012.2196801

Google Scholar

[8] E. Sulaiman, T. Kosaka, and N. Matsui, Design Optimization of 12Slot-10Pole hybrid excitation flux switching synchronous machine with 0. 4 kg permanent magnet for hybrid electric vehicles, Proc. of International IEEE Conference on Power Electronics and ECCE Asia (ICPE & ECCE), (2011).

DOI: 10.1109/icpe.2011.5944423

Google Scholar

[9] W. Fei, P.C.K. Luk, J. Shen, and Y. Wang, A Novel Outer-Rotor Permanent-Magnet Flux-Switching Machine for Urban Electric Vehicle Propulsion, in 3rd International Conference on Power Electronics Systems and Applications (PESA), (2009) 1-6.

DOI: 10.1109/iecon.2013.6700350

Google Scholar

[10] M.Z. Ahmad, E. Sulaiman, Z.A. Haron, and T. Kosaka, Preliminary Studies on a New Outer-Rotor Permanent Magnet Flux Switching Machine with Hybrid Excitation Flux for Direct Drive EV Applications, IEEE Int. Power and Energy Conference (PECON2012), (2012).

DOI: 10.1109/pecon.2012.6450350

Google Scholar

[11] E. Sulaiman, T. Kosaka, N. Matsui, and M. Z. Ahmad, Design Studies on High Torque and High Power Density Hybrid Excitation Flux Switching Synchronous Motor for HEV Applications, in IEEE International Power Engineering and Optimization Conference (PEOCO), (2012).

DOI: 10.1109/peoco.2012.6230885

Google Scholar

[12] E. Sulaiman, M. F. M. Teridi, Z. A. Husin, M. Z. Ahmad and T. Kosaka, Performances Comparison of 24S-10P and 24S-14P Field Excitation Flux Switching Machine (FEFSM) With Single DC-Coil Polarity, International Journal of Energy & Power Engineering Research, 01 (2013).

DOI: 10.1109/peoco.2013.6564513

Google Scholar