Increasing End-of-Life Recovery Profit Using Axiomatic Design Principles: A Case of Mobile Phone Keypad

Article Preview

Abstract:

Application of axiomatic design (AD) for the purpose of enhancing end-of-life recovery potential of a product has been the main focus of this paper. To demonstrate the usage of AD in this particular area, a case study that involves keypad assemblies of mobile phones is presented. The functional requirements (FR) of the two assemblies were defined differently (only Handset 2 involves refurbishment-related FRs). Using evaluation approach presented by Kwak and Kim (2010), it can be observed that when recovery-related requirements are omitted, application of AD produces a keypad assembly that fulfills the FRs derived from customer needs with more complicated product architecture. In contrast, when recovery-related FRs are included during problem definition using axiomatic approach, the disassemblability of the resulted keypad is improved and thus increasing recovery potential in the event of replacing defective keypad, while satisfying product-related FRs.

You have full access to the following eBook

Info:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] K. Ramani, D. Ramanujan, W. Z. Bernstein, F. Zhao, J. Sutherland, C. Handwerker and J. K. Choi, Integrated Sustainable Life Cycle Design: A Review, Journal of Mechanical Design. 132 (2010) 1-15.

DOI: 10.1115/1.4002308

Google Scholar

[2] M. Kwak and H. M. Kim, Evaluating End-of-Life Recovery Profit by a Simultaneous Consideration of Product Design and Recovery Network Design, Journal of Mechanical Design. 132 (2010) 1-17.

DOI: 10.1115/1.4001411

Google Scholar

[3] S. K. Fixson, Assessing Product Architecture Costing: Product Life Cycles, Allocation Rules, and Cost Models, Paper presented at ASME 2004 Design Engineering Technical Conferences (2004).

DOI: 10.1115/detc2004-57458

Google Scholar

[4] N. P. Suh, The Principles of Design, Oxford University Press, New York, (1990).

Google Scholar

[5] S. Finger and J. R. Dixon, A Review of Research in Mechanical Engineering Design. Part I: Descriptive, Prescriptive, and Computer-Based Models of Design Processes, Research in Engineering Design. 1 (1989) 51-67.

DOI: 10.1007/bf01580003

Google Scholar

[6] G. J. Park, Analytic Methods for Design Practice, Springer, (2007).

Google Scholar

[7] C. S. Yu and S. J. Lee, Method for Keypad Optimization, Patent No. US 7551162 B2, (2009).

Google Scholar

[8] J. Fedorjaka, Metal Dome Switch Assembly with Enhanced Snap Ratio, Patent No. US 7378609 B1, (2008).

Google Scholar

[9] Y. Okamoto and K. Sako, Movable Contact Unit for Panel Switch and Panel Switch Using the Same, Patent No. 5986228, (1999).

Google Scholar

[10] K. Z. Chen, Development of Integrated Design for Disassembly and Recycling in Concurrent Engineering, Integrated Manufacturing Systems. 12 (2001) 67 - 79.

DOI: 10.1108/09576060110361555

Google Scholar