Role of Risk Management in Effective Maintenance

Abstract:

Every manufacturer requires plant maintenance. Knowing that an effective maintenance system increases sales and decreases maintenance cost of the production facility, maintenance is deemed to be substantial contributions to improved plant profit changing from a necessary evil to a profit centre. Unfortunately, this sometime is a far cry from reality. This paper offers a concept of incorporating risk into maintenance and development of a Decision Support System (DSS) for decision makers in the maintenance department. It helps prioritise critical equipment and select its associated maintenance strategy for optimum results. The results of validating the devised AHP-based software package in a case study company in Indonesia are promising since the company successfully gains 3.65% in Net Line Efficiency and 3.13% in Gross Line Efficiency as well as enjoys an advantage over 4.56 points decrease in Operation Performance Loss.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volume 776)
• Pages: 349-354
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.776.349
• Online since: July 2015
• Authors: Hari Agung Yuniarto*, Putu Fransisca Paristiawati
• Keywords: Effective Maintenance, Maintenance Strategy, Risk Assessment

References

[1] Gross, J. M., 2002, Fundamental of Preventive Maintenance, American Management Association, New York.

[2] Smith, D. J., 2001, Reliability Maintainability and Risk: Practical Method for Engineers, 6th ed., Butterworth Heinemann, Burlinghon.

[3] Yuniarto, H. A. and Osada, H., 2009, Developing a Novel Framework for Quality System and Systems Thinking to Integrate: A Paradigm Shift in Maintenance, Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference of Manufacturing Engineering and Engineering Management – World Congress on Engineering 2009 (WCE 2009), ISBN: 978-988-17012-5-1 (Vol. 1), 1-3 July 2009 Imperial College London, London, UK: International Association of Engineers (IAENG) & Imperial College London, pp.550-4.

DOI: 10.18057/icass2018.p.042

[4] Backlund, F. and Hannu, J., 2002, Can We Make Maintenance Decisions on Risk Analysis Results?, Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, Vol. 8, No. 1, p.77–91.

DOI: 10.1108/13552510210420603

[5] Lenahan, T. (1999). Turnaround Management, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, England.

[6] Khrisnasamy, L., Khan, F., Haddara, M., 2005, Development of a Risk Based Maintenance (RBM) Strategy for a Power Generating Plant, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, Vol. 18, pp.69-81.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2005.01.002

[7] Khan, F. I., and Abbasi, S. A., 1998, Risk Assessment in Chemical Process Industries: Advance Techniques. New Delhi: Discovery Publishing House, p.376.

[8] ISO 31000, 2009, Risk Management: Priciples and Guidelines, Int'l Organization for Standardiszation.

[9] Khan, F. and Haddara, M., 2003, Risk-Based Maintenance (RBM): A Quantitative Approach for Maintenance/Inspection Scheduing and Planning, Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, Vol. 16, pp.561-573.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2003.08.011

[10] Ebeling, Charles., 1997, An Introduction to Reliability and Maintainability Engineering, The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc.

[11] Vesely, W.E., Goldberg, F.F., Robert, N.H., Haasl, D. F, 1981, Fault Tree Handbook, System And Reliability Research Office of Nuclear regulatory Research U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.

DOI: 10.2172/6705152