Study on Wing Aspect Ratio on the Performance of a Gliding Robotic Fish

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this paper, the performance of a gliding robotic fish with different wing aspect ratio is investigated. The gliding robotic fish, developed by Michigan State University, has the energy efficient locomotion of an underwater glider and high maneuverability of a robotic fish. ANSYS Computational Fluid Dynamics turbulence model was used to determine lift and drag coefficients for various wing aspect ratios at different angle of attack. Subsequently, the corresponding glide angle and velocity were determined analytically based on its dynamic model. The simulation results compare well with published experimental data and shows that the drag and lift coefficients are inversely proportional to the wing aspect ratio. As such, a gliding robotic fish with a low wing aspect ratio is suitable for shallow waters only, due to the high lift forces generated for a given angle of attack, requiring greater energy to sustain the glide velocity and vice versa.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

248-253

Citation:

Online since:

August 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] X. Tan, Autonomous robotic fish as mobile sensor platforms: Challenges and potential solutions, Marine Technology Society Journal, vol. 45, pp.31-40, (2011).

DOI: 10.4031/mtsj.45.4.2

Google Scholar

[2] F. Zhang, J. Thon, C. Thon, and X. Tan, Miniature underwater glider: Design, modeling, and experimental results, in Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2012 IEEE International Conference on, 2012, pp.4904-4910.

DOI: 10.1109/icra.2012.6225264

Google Scholar

[3] F. Zhang, J. Thon, C. Thon, and X. Tan, Miniature Underwater Glider: Design and Experimental Results, (2014).

DOI: 10.1109/icra.2012.6225264

Google Scholar

[4] F. Zhang, F. Zhang, and X. Tan, Steady spiraling motion of gliding robotic fish, in Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on, 2012, pp.1754-1759.

DOI: 10.1109/iros.2012.6385860

Google Scholar

[5] S. Zhang, J. Yu, A. Zhang, and F. Zhang, Spiraling motion of underwater gliders: Modeling, analysis, and experimental results, Ocean Engineering, vol. 60, pp.1-13, (2013).

DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2012.12.023

Google Scholar

[6] N. E. Leonard and J. G. Graver, Model-based feedback control of autonomous underwater gliders, Oceanic Engineering, IEEE Journal of, vol. 26, pp.633-645, (2001).

DOI: 10.1109/48.972106

Google Scholar

[7] J. G. Graver, Underwater gliders: Dynamics, control and design, Citeseer, (2005).

Google Scholar

[8] J. Graver, J. Liu, C. Woolsey, and N. E. Leonard, Design and analysis of an underwater vehicle for controlled gliding, in Proc. 32nd Conference on Information Sciences and Systems, 1998, pp.801-806.

Google Scholar

[9] D. T. Greenwood, Principles of dynamics: Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ, (1988).

Google Scholar

[10] J. S. Geisbert, Hydrodynamic modeling for autonomous underwater vehicles using computational and semi-empirical methods, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, (2007).

Google Scholar

[11] F. I. Fluent 6. 1 User's Guide.

Google Scholar

[12] P. Jagadeesh, K. Murali, and V. Idichandy, Experimental investigation of hydrodynamic force coefficients over AUV hull form, Ocean Engineering, vol. 36, pp.113-118, (2009).

DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2008.11.008

Google Scholar

[13] A. Sohankar, C. Norberg, and L. Davidson, Low‐Reynolds‐number flow around a square cylinder at incidence: study of blockage, onset of vortex shedding and outlet boundary condition, International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, vol. 26, pp.39-56, (1998).

DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0363(19980115)26:1<39::aid-fld623>3.0.co;2-p

Google Scholar

[14] M. F. bin Ibrahim, M. Ovinis, and K. bin Shehabuddeen, An Underwater Glider for Subsea Intervention: A Technical Feasibility Study, Applied Mechanics and Materials, vol. 393, pp.561-566, (2013).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.393.561

Google Scholar

[15] M. Y. Javaid, M. Ovinis, T. Nagarajan, and F. B. Hashim, Underwater Gliders: A Review, in MATEC Web of Conferences, 2014, p.02020.

DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/20141302020

Google Scholar

[16] M. Grund, L. Freitag, J. Preisig, and K. Ball, The PLUSNet underwater communications system: acoustic telemetry for undersea surveillance, in OCEANS 2006, 2006, pp.1-5.

DOI: 10.1109/oceans.2006.307036

Google Scholar

[17] S. A. Jenkins, D. E. Humphreys, J. Sherman, J. Osse, C. Jones, N. Leonard, et al., Underwater glider system study, (2003).

Google Scholar