Comparative Study of Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) and Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA) between Conventional and Machine Assisted Napier Grass Harvest Works

Article Preview

Abstract:

Most of Napier grass industry in Malaysia is labored in small and medium scale. Therefore, the harvesting works are done manually by man power using conventional equipment such as sickle and machete. However, there are some efforts made to design the low cost equipment in assisting this Napier grass harvesting works. The aim of this study is to compare the Rapid Upper Limb Assessment (RULA) and Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA) performance in order to evaluate the certain body parts condition during harvesting works by using conventional equipment and innovation machine assisted. Based on survey, conventional harvesting method might increase the risk of low back pain (LBP) due to repetitive stooping posture. Furthermore, the back biomechanical load and force impact were also not handling wisely. The objective of this study is to prove that the usage of machine during harvesting works might improve the body posture especially on stoop level condition. Based on results, the overall RULA and REBA score are excellently improved as well as trunk position which is depicts the stooped level condition. Hence, the innovation of harvest machine could contribute to the Napier grass industry especially on small and medium entrepreneur.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

275-280

Citation:

Online since:

August 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] M. Anem, Rumput Napier, Article of Agro Technology. (2012).

Google Scholar

[2] Oudenhoven, R., Ghista, D.N., and Ray, G., Biomechanical Aspects of Low Back Pain in Human Body Dynamic Oxford, OUP. (1982).

Google Scholar

[3] Ghista, D.N., Subbaraj, S., Mazumdar, J., and Rezaian, S.M., The Biomechanics of Back Pain. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology. (1998) 36.

DOI: 10.1109/51.677166

Google Scholar

[4] Meng Qing-hua and Meng Qing-jun. Study on lumbar spine stresses during manual materials handling based on finite element method. International Conference on Computational and Information Sciences. (2010) 760-763.

DOI: 10.1109/iccis.2010.189

Google Scholar

[5] Kristen, L.K. Ergonomic Assessment and Low Back Pain Among Commercial Fishermen. Ph. D Thessis in Department of Epidemeology, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina. (2006).

Google Scholar

[6] Lars, I.E.D., and Carlo, J.D.L. Activation Imbalances in Lumbar Spine Muscles in the Presence of Chronic Low Back Pain. Journal of Applied Physiological. 94 (2003) 1410-1420.

DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01183.2001

Google Scholar

[7] Dedering, A., Roos af Hjelmsater, M., Elfving, B., Harms Ringdahl, K., and Nemeth, G., Between-days reliability of subjective and objective assessments of back extensor muscle fatigue in subjects without lower-back pain. J Electromyography Kinesiol. 10 (2000).

DOI: 10.1016/s1050-6411(00)00009-2

Google Scholar

[8] Lariviere, C., Arsenault, A.B., Gravel, D., Gagnon, D., and Liosel, P. The comparison of trunk muscles EMG activation between subjects with and without chronic low back pain during flexion-extrnsion and lateral bending tasks. J Electromyography Kinesiol. 10 (2000).

DOI: 10.1016/s1050-6411(99)00027-9

Google Scholar

[9] Ulrey, B.L. Effect of A Weight Transfer Device on Muscle Activities, Joint Flexions, and Low Back Loads in the Stooped Posture. PhD Thessis of University of California. (2011).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2012.08.014

Google Scholar

[10] N. Schafer, H. Dupuis, and E. Hartung. Acute Effects of Shock-Type Vibration Transmitted to the Hand- Arm System. International Archieves of Occupational and Environmental Health. (1984) 49-59.

DOI: 10.1007/bf00378067

Google Scholar

[11] Alan Hedge. RULA Employee Assessment Worksheet. Cornell University (2000).

Google Scholar

[12] Hignett, S., and McAtamney, L. Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA). Applied Ergonomics. (2000), Volume 31, Issue 2: 201-5.

DOI: 10.1016/s0003-6870(99)00039-3

Google Scholar