Minimising Material Handling Cost Using Relative Factors for Fixed Area Cell Layout Problem

Article Preview

Abstract:

An importance of material handling is the movement of materials at the minimum cost and also an effective material handling system reduces the manufacturing cost. The objective of this paper is to reduce the material handling cost by placing the production equipments within the cell in the given fixed area layout. Few relative factors are considered while designing the layout. These factors help in improving the layout design. While designing the layout some higher cost assigned for some important moves. A benchmark problem has solved by using Artificial Bee Colony (ABC) and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithms. The results are tabulated, compared, and analyzed. Based on that analysis the PSO algorithm performed well and given better placement of machines with minimum material handling cost.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

311-317

Citation:

Online since:

August 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] G.H. Hu, Y.P. Chen, Z.D. Zhou and H.C. Fang, A genetic algorithm for the inter-cell layout and material handling system design, Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 34 (2007) 1153–1163.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-006-0694-0

Google Scholar

[2] I. Mihajlovic, Z. Zivkovic, N. Strbac, D. Zivkovic and A. Jovanovic, Using genetic algorithms to resolve Facility layout problem, Serbian J Manag. 2 (2007) 35–46.

Google Scholar

[3] S. Jannat, A.A. Khaled, and Sanjoy Kumar Paul, Optimal solution for multi-objective facility layout problem using genetic algorithm, Proceedings of the 2010 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management Dhaka, Bangladesh, January 9 – 10, (2010).

Google Scholar

[4] Maricar G. Misola and Bryan B. Navarro, Optimal facility layout problem solution using genetic algorithm, World Academy of Science, Engg. and Tech., Int J Mechanical, Aerospace, Indus Mechat Engg. 7 (2013) 616-621.

Google Scholar

[5] M.R. Ganesh, J. Dileeplal and Soni Kuriakose, Genetic – Simulated annealing algorithm for robust layout in dynamic facility layout problem, Int J Inno Res Adv Engg. 1 (2014) 288-293.

Google Scholar

[6] A. Keivani, S.N. Rafienejad, M.R. Kaviani, H. Afshari, A simulated annealing for multi floor facility layout problem, Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science, 2010, Vol II WCECS 2010, October 20-22, 2010, San Francisco, USA.

Google Scholar

[7] Rhythm Suren Wadhwa1 and Terje K. Lien, Comparison and application of metaheuristic population-based optimization algorithms in manufacturing automation, Int J Comput Sci. 8 (2011) 19-30.

Google Scholar

[8] R.M. Satheesh Kumar, P. Asokan and S. Kumanan, Design of loop layout in flexible manufacturing system using non-traditional optimization technique, Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 38 (2008) 594–599.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-007-1032-x

Google Scholar

[9] Xiangyu Kong, Sanyang Liu, Zhen Wang, Longquan Yong, Hybrid artificial bee colony algorithm for global numerical optimization, J Comp Info Sys. 8 (2012) 2367–2374.

Google Scholar

[10] Nebojsa Bacanin and Milan Tuba, Artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm for constrained optimization improved with genetic operators, Stud Inform Cont. 21(2012) 137-146.

DOI: 10.24846/v21i2y201203

Google Scholar

[11] M. Saravanan and P.V. Arulkumar, Design and optimization for fixed area cellular layout problems. Int J Innov Sust Devel. 7 (2013) 91-109.

Google Scholar

[12] Dervis Karaboga, Artificial bee colony algorithm. Scholarpedia, 5 (2010) 6915.

DOI: 10.4249/scholarpedia.6915

Google Scholar