Mechanical Analysis of a Hybrid Approach for a Lower Limb Rehabilitation Robot

Abstract:

The design of lower limb rehabilitation robot can be categorized into two approaches: the end-effector and the exoskeleton. Both types of the robots have different advantages and disadvantages. The exoskeleton type is designed to mimic the kinematic structure of the human skeleton by controlling hip and knee joints but the end-effector type is driven at the footplate which allows patients to perform various gait training exercise. In this paper, the end-effector and exoskeleton device are compared based on dynamical analysis using Matlab's Simechanics simulation. The hybrid lower limb rehabilitation robot is also proposed based on the exoskeleton robot with the adjustable mechanical coupling interface between human and robot and the active footplate. The hybrid design combines the advantages of both the exoskeleton and the end-effector by allowing the mechanical coupling parameters and the active footplate controller to be adjustable at different stages of training. The proposed design can improve both joints misalignment and joint trajectory tracking problems in both existing approaches.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 789-790)
• Pages: 665-674
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.789-790.665
• Online since: September 2015
• Authors: Nakrob Wanichnukhrox, Thavida Maneewarn, Szathys Songschon
• Keywords: End-Effector, Exoskeleton, Rehabilitation Robots, Stroke

References

[1] Vaughan, Christopher L., Dynamics of Human Gait. Western Cape: Kiboho Publishers., (1999).

[2] J.F. Veneman, R. Kruidhof, E. E. G. Hekman, F.C.T. van der Helm, and H. Van Der Kooij, Design of a Series Elastic-and Bowdencable-based actuation system for use as torque-actuator in exoskeleton-type training. Proceedings of IEEE 9th Int. Conf. on Rehab. Robots, (2005).

DOI: 10.1109/icorr.2005.1501150

[3] J.F. Veneman, R. Kruidhof, E. E. G. Hekman, R. Ekkelenkamp,E. H. F. Van Asseldonk, and H. Van Der Kooij, Design and evaluation of the Lopes exoskeleton robot for interactive gait rehabilitation, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 15 (3) (2007).

DOI: 10.1109/tnsre.2007.903919

[4] G. Colombo, M. Joerg, R. Schreier, and V. Dietz, Treadmill training of paraplegic patients using a robotic orthosis, Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 37 (6) (2000) 693–700.

[5] G. Colombo, M. Wirz, and V. Dietz, Driven gait orthosis for improvement of locomotor training in paraplegic patients, Spinal Cord, 39 (5) (2001) 252–255.

DOI: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101154

[6] M. Wirz, D. H. Zemon, R. Rupp et al., Effectiveness of automated locomotor training in patients with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury: a multicenter trial, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 86 (4) (2005) 672– 680.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.08.004

[7] T. G. Hornby, D. H. Zemon, and D. Campbell, Robotic assisted, body-weight-supported treadmill training in individuals following motor incomplete spinal cord injury, Physical Therapy, 85 (1) (2005) 52–66.

DOI: 10.1093/ptj/85.1.52

[8] J. Hidler, Nichols, M. Pelliccio et al., Multicenter randomized clinical trial evaluating the effectiveness of the Lokomat in subacute stroke, Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 23 (1) (2009) 5–13.

DOI: 10.1177/1545968308326632

[9] K. P. Westlake and C. Patten, Pilot study of Lokomat versus manual-assisted treadmill training for locomotor recovery post-stroke, Journal of Neuro Engineering and Rehabilitation, 6 (1) (2009) article 18.

DOI: 10.1186/1743-0003-6-18

[10] D. Reinkensmeyer, J. Wynne, and S. Harkema, A robotic tool for studying locomotor adaptation and rehabilitation, in Proceedings of the 2nd Joint Meeting of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society and the Biomedical Engineering Society, 3 (2002).

DOI: 10.1109/iembs.2002.1053318

[11] J.L. Emken, S. J. Harkema, J. A. Beres-Jones, C. K. Ferreira, and D. J. Reinkensmeyer, Feasibility of manual teach-andreplay and continuous impedance shaping for robotic locomotor training following spinal cord injury, IEEE Transactionson Biomedical Engineering, 55 (1) (2008).

DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2007.910683

[12] G. R. West, Powered gait orthosis and method of utilizing same, Patent number 6 689 075, (2004).

[13] K. Banala, S. K. Agrawal, and J. P. Scholz, Active Leg Exoskeleton (ALEX) for gait rehabilitation of motor-impaired patients, in Proceedings of the 10th IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, (ICORR '07), (2007).

DOI: 10.1109/icorr.2007.4428456

[14] S.K. Banala, S. H. Kim, S. K. Agrawal, and J. P. Scholz, Robot assisted gait training with active leg exoskeleton (ALEX), IEEETransactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 17 (1) (2009) 2–8.

DOI: 10.1109/tnsre.2008.2008280

[15] S. Freivogel, J. Mehrholz, T. Husak-Sotomayor, and D. Schmalohr, Gait training with the newly developed LokoHelp -system is feasible for non-ambulatory patients after stroke, spinal cord and brain injury. A feasibility study, Brain Injury, 22 (7-8) (2008).

DOI: 10.1080/02699050801941771

[16] S. Freivogel, D. Schmalohr, and J. Mehrholz, Improved walking ability and reduced therapeutic stress with an electromechanical gait device, Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 41 (9) (2009) 734–739.

DOI: 10.2340/16501977-0422

[17] S. Hesse and D. Uhlenbrock, A mechanized gait trainer for restoration of gait, Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 37 (6) (2000) 701–708.

[18] C. Werner, S. Von Frankenberg, T. Treig, M. Konrad, and S. Hesse, Treadmill training with partial body weight support and an electromechanical gait trainer for restoration of gait in subacute stroke patients: a randomized crossover study, Stroke, 33 (12) (2002).

DOI: 10.1161/01.str.0000035734.61539.f6

[19] M. Pohl, C. Werner, M. Holzgraefe et al., Repetitive locomotor training and physiotherapy improve walking and basic activities of daily living after stroke: a single-blind, randomized multicentre trial(deutsche gangtrainerstudie, degas), Clinical Rehabilitation, 21 (1) (2007).

DOI: 10.1177/0269215506071281

[20] S. H. Peurala, O. Airaksinen, P. Huuskonen et al., Effects of intensive therapy using gait trainer or floor walking exercises early after stroke, Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 41 (3) (2009) 166–173.

DOI: 10.2340/16501977-0304

[21] H. Schmidt, Hapticwalker—a novel haptic device for walking simulation, in Proceedings of the EuroHaptics Conference, (2004) 60–67, Munich, Germany, June (2004).

[22] S. Hesse and C. Werner, Connecting research to the needs of patients and clinicians, Brain Research Bulletin, 78 (1) (2009) 26–34.

DOI: 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2008.06.004

[23] H. Yano, S. Tamefusa, N. Tanaka, H. Saitou, and H. Iwata, Gait rehabilitation system for stair climbling and decending, in Proceedings of the IEEE Haptics Symposium, (HAPTICS '10), (2010) 393–400, Waltham, Mass, USA, March (2010).

DOI: 10.1109/haptic.2010.5444627

[24] I˜naki D´ıaz, Jorge Juan Gil, and Emilio S´anchez Lower-Limb Robotic Rehabilitation: Literature Review and Challenges, Hindawi Publishing Corporation Journal of Robotics (2011), Article ID 759764, 11 pages.

[25] P.Y. Cheng P, P.Y. Lai ., Comparison of Exoskeleton Robots and End-Effector Robots on Training Methods and Gait Biomechanics, Intelligent Robotics and Applications Lecture Notes in Computer Science  8102 (2013) 258-266.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-40852-6_27