The Formalization and Generalization of Preferences for Transport Safety Project Design

Abstract:

Firstly we describe the linguistic approach to the definition of drivers preferences about transport safety project design as humanistic system in Zadeh's sense. Then we short describe introductory research. Eight drivers were asked to evaluate their level of danger in the 14 different traffic situations. Following we propose F. Herrera model; selection process-applied of linguistic dominance degrees as useful for modeling drivers preferences. Finally we make short remark about mathematical generalization suggested Herrera's model as L-(lattice) fuzzy sets. Additional to theoretical approach our research was carried in order to determine the training project for groups of drivers to prevent accidents involving trucks.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volume 791)
• Pages: 146-152
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.791.146
• Online since: September 2015
• Authors: Marek Jakubowski, Michał Charlak*, Tomasz Szot
• Keywords: Drivers Training, Humanistic System, L-(lattice) Fuzzy Set, Linguistic Dominance Degrees, Transport Safety

References

[1] L.A. Zadeh, The Concept of a Linguistic Variable and Its Application to Approximate Reasoning, Memorandum No. ERL-M411, Electronics Res. Lab., Univ. of Calif., Berkeley, October (1973).

[2] C.V. Negoita, D.A. Ralescu, Application of Fuzzy Sets to Systems Analysis, Birkhauser Verlag, Basel, Boston, (1975).

[3] F.J. Cabrerizo, R. Ureña, J.A. Morente-Molinera, W. Pedrycz, F. Chiclana, E. Herrera-Viedma, A New Selection Process Based on Granular Computing for Group Decision Making Problems, in: H. Fuijta, A. Selamat (Eds), Intelligent Software Methodologies, Tools and Techniques, Springer, 2014, pp.13-24.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-17530-0_2

[4] I. Łapuńka, The Multi-criteria approach to Project selection based on fuzzy sets theory, Research in Logistics & Production, 2, 2 (2012) 193-203.

[5] M. Charlak, M.A. Jakubowski, Comparison of fuzzy systems and artificial neural networks, Advances in Science and Technology Research Journal, 4 (2010) 54-64.

[6] F. Herrera, E. Herrera-Viedma, J.L. Verdegay, Preference degrees over linguistic preference relations in decision making, Operations Research and Decisions, 3 (1995) 42-45.

[7] Tanino T., Fuzzy Preference Relations in Group Decision Making, in: J. Kacprzyk, M. Roubens (Eds. ), Non-Conventional Preference Relations in Decision Making, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1988, pp.54-71.

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-51711-2_4

[8] F. Herrera, E. Herrera-Viedma, J.L. Verdegay, On dominance degrees in group decision making with linguistic preferences, In Proceedings on 4th International Workshop on Current Issues in Fuzzy Technologies: Decision Models and Systems, Trento, 1994, pp.113-117.

DOI: 10.1016/s0165-0114(96)00047-4

[9] J.A. Goguen, L- fuzzy Sets, J. Math. Annal. Appl., 18 (1967) 145-174.

[10] G. Birkhoff, Lattice Theory, Amer. Math. Soc. Colloq. Publ. 25 (1967).

[11] M. Fathi-Torbagan, A. Hoffman, Fuzzy Logik and Blackboard - Modelle in der technischen Anwendung, R. Oldenbourg Verlag, Munchen, Wien, (1994).

[12] G. Bohme, Fuzzy Logik, Einfuhrung in die algebraischen und logischen Grundlagen, Springer Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, (1993).

[13] R.E. Moore, Interval Analysis, Englewood Cliffs, (1966).

[14] H.J. Skala, Non - Archimedean Utility Theory, Reidel, Dodrecht, Boston, (1975).