Performance Measurement and Risk Management Framework of the Enterprise’s Integrated in Logistic Chains in the Context of the Information Society

Article Preview

Abstract:

The intensified competition, the frequent change of the clients’ preferences and the globalization of the capital, product, service and information flows have turned the efficient product management into an essential factor for increasing competitiveness in production systems integrated in supply chains. In this context, industrial excellence can be obtained only by an efficient process piloting, using some performance measurement systems that permit a good substantiation of the decisions based on correct and reliable information, taking into account the risks specific to supply chains. The paper includes a review of the literature in the field of performance measurement for supply chains to understand the current practice and contributes to the development of the supply chain performance measurement framework using risk management, the case study method, a statistic quantitative data analysis and modern performance measurement techniques such as: balanced scorecard and supply chain operation reference.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

47-52

Citation:

Online since:

October 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] A. Duică, M.C. Duică, Performanţe şi riscuri în management (Performance and Risk Management), Valahia University Press, Târgovişte, 2009, pp.6-11.

Google Scholar

[2] Ph. Lorino,  Méthodes et pratiques de la performance, Les Editions d'Organisation, Paris, 1998, p.20.

Google Scholar

[3] R. S. Kaplan, D. P. Norton, The balanced scorecard, Boston: HBS Press, 1996, p.105.

Google Scholar

[4] W.W. Eckerson, Performance dashboards, Hoboken, NJ: JohnWiley & Sons, 2006, p.10.

Google Scholar

[5] Supply Chain Operations Reference (SCOR®) model Overview - Version 10. 0, Supply Chain Council, 2010, pp.6-12.

Google Scholar

[6] Information on https: /www. theirm. org/about/risk-management.

Google Scholar

[7] Information on http: /panorama-consulting. com/resource-center/2015-erp-report.

Google Scholar

[8] Information on http: /ec. europa. eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index. php/E-business_integration.

Google Scholar

[9] H. L Lee, C. Billington, The evolution of supply chain management models and practices at Hewlett Packard, Interface, Vol. 25, no. 5, 1995, pp.42-63.

DOI: 10.1287/inte.25.5.42

Google Scholar

[10] Information on http: /ec. europa. eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index. php/E-business_integration.

Google Scholar

[11] F. Giraud, Contrôle de gestion et pilotage de la performance, Gualino, Paris, 2002, p.47.

Google Scholar

[12] R. S. Kaplan, D. P. Norton, The balanced scorecard, Boston: HBS Press, 1996, pp.70-74.

Google Scholar

[13] S. Kot, K. Grondys, R. Szopa, Theory of inventory management based on demand forecasting, Polish Journal Of Management Studies, vol 3/2011, p.147.

Google Scholar

[14] Z. Panov, E. Ristova, Lj. Stefanovska, Supply chain's performance measurement system an integrated framework, Proceedings of the Scientific - Technical Union of Mechanical Engineering, Volume 8/128, September 2011, p.170.

Google Scholar