Unsteady Aerodynamic Characteristics of the Pitched Supersonic Biplane

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this work, supersonic biplanes of the Busemann concept have been analysed, focusing on the unsteady aerodynamic characteristic due to flow disturbance using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) codes in viscous flow. Flow disturbance is modelled by sinusoidal pitch motion simulated by mesh morphing using radial basis functions (RBF) method. The results suggest that there are two flow patterns of the Busemann biplane: oblique wave sequences flow (Pattern A) and choke-flow (Pattern B) with higher wave drag. Unsteady aerodynamic disturbance represented by pitch motion may cause flow pattern transformation. We have also obtained that Pattern B is more stable than Pattern A and choke-flow cannot be eliminated even after returning to the initial flight attitude. Moreover, amplitudes and frequencies of sinusoidal pitch motion play important roles in flow pattern transformation and there exist critical amplitudes and frequencies.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

523-530

Citation:

Online since:

October 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Busemann A., Aerodynamic Lift at Supersonic Speeds. The 5th Volta Aerodynamic Conference, Volta, Italy, October 3, (1935).

Google Scholar

[2] Licher R.M., Optimum Two-Dimensional Multiplanes in Supersonic Flow. Douglass Aircraft Conference, USA, (1955).

Google Scholar

[3] Hua R. H., Ye Z. Y., Drag Reduction Method for Supersonic Missile Based on Busemann Biplane Concept. Chinese Journal of Applied Mechanics, Vol. 29 (2012), pp.536-540 (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[4] Xu Y. Z., Xu Z. Q., Li S. G., et al., A Hypersonic Lift Mechanism With Decoupled Lift and Drag Surfaces. Science China: Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy, Vol. 56 (2013), p.981–988.

DOI: 10.1007/s11433-013-5078-5

Google Scholar

[5] Kusunose K., A Fundamental Study for the Development of Boomless Supersonic Transport Aircraft. The 44th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, USA, January 9-12, (2006).

DOI: 10.2514/6.2006-654

Google Scholar

[6] Matsushima K., Takanashi S., An Inverse Design Method for Wings Using Integral Equations and Its Recent Progress. Proceedings of Lectures and Workshop International Recent Advances in Multidisciplinary Technology and Modeling, Japan, (2008).

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-322-89952-1_8

Google Scholar

[7] Kuratani N., Ogawa T., Yamashita H., Yonezawa M., and Obayashi S., Experimental and Computational Fluid Dynamics Around Supersonic Biplane for Sonic-Boom Reduction. 13th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference (28th AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference), AIAA Paper 2007-3674, (2007).

DOI: 10.2514/6.2007-3674

Google Scholar

[8] Kashitani M., Yamaguchi Y., Kai Y., and Hirata K., Preliminary Study on Lift Coefficient of Biplane Airfoil in Smoke Wind Tunnel. 46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit. AIAA Paper 2008–349, Jan. (2008).

DOI: 10.2514/6.2008-349

Google Scholar

[9] Kusunose K, Matsushima K., Maruyama D., Supersonic Biplane—A Review. Progress in Aerospace Sciences, Vol. 47 (2011), pp.53-87.

DOI: 10.1016/j.paerosci.2010.09.003

Google Scholar

[10] Masahito Y., Shigeru O., Aerodynamic Performance of the Three Dimensional Lifting Supersonic Biplane. Journal of Aircraft, 47 (2010), pp.983-990.

DOI: 10.2514/1.46651

Google Scholar

[11] Wataru Y., Kazuhiro K., Biplane-Wing/Twin-Body-Fuselage Configuration for Innovative Supersonic Transport. Journal of Aircraft, 51 (2014), p.1942-(1952).

DOI: 10.2514/1.c032581

Google Scholar

[12] Maruyama D., Matsuzawa T., Kusunose K., Matsushima K., and Nakahashi K., Consideration at Off-design Conditions of Supersonic Flows Around Biplane Airfoils, " 45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, AIAA Paper 2007-687, Jan. (2007).

DOI: 10.2514/6.2007-687

Google Scholar

[13] Yamashita H., Yonezawa M., Obayashi S., and Kusunose K., A Study of Busemann-Type Biplane for Avoiding Choked Flow. 45th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, AIAA Paper 2007-688, Jan. (2007).

DOI: 10.2514/6.2007-688

Google Scholar

[14] Hu R., Jameson A., Wang Q. Q., Adjoint-based Aerodynamic Optimization of Supersonic Biplane Airfoils. Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 49 (2012), pp.802-814.

DOI: 10.2514/1.c031417

Google Scholar

[15] Jiang Y. W., Methodology of Generalized Mesh and Its Application to Solve the Navier-Stokes Equations. PHD paper of Northwestern Polytechnical University. (2013).

Google Scholar

[16] Rendall T.C.S., Allen C.B. Efficient Mesh Motion Using Radial Basis Functions with Data Reduction Algorithms. Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 228 (2009) pp.6231-6249.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2009.05.013

Google Scholar