The Study on the Dynamic Response of Cylindrical Pressure Hull on the Different Shock Loading Empirical Formula

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper focuses on the comparison between underwater explosion (UNDEX) shock loading empirical formulations. First, the numerical simulations for a cylindrical pressure hull subjected to UNDEX loading were conducted and the results are close to the failure modes shown in experiments of Kwon (1993). Second, the empirical UNDEX loading formula of Cole (1948), Keil (1961) and Shin (1994) used in cylinder subjected to underwater shock loading were compared. The simulation results by using three empirical formulas were compared and Shin’s (or Cole’s) empirical formula was shown to be better than the other empirical formulations when subjected to an UNDEX under the same conditions. The analytical results offer a valuable reference to the research of underwater explosion.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

604-609

Citation:

Online since:

October 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Kwon, Y. W., Fox, P. K., Underwater shock responses of a cylinder subjected to aside-on explosion. Comput. Struct., 48 (4), 1993:646–737.

Google Scholar

[2] Ramajeyathilagam K, Vendhan CP. Deformation and rupture of thin rectangular plates subjected to underwater shock. International Journal of Impact Engineering 2004; 30(6): 699-719.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2003.01.001

Google Scholar

[3] Shin YS. Ship shock modeling and simulation for far-field underwater explosion. Computers & Structures 2004; 82: 2211-2219.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2004.03.075

Google Scholar

[4] Liang CC, Tai YS. Shock response of a surface ship subjected to noncontact underwater explosions. Ocean Engineering 2006; 33: 748-772.

DOI: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2005.03.011

Google Scholar

[5] Wang H, Zhu X, Cheng YS, Lin J. Experimental and numerical investigation of ship structure subjected to close-in underwater shock wave and following gas bubble pulse . Marine Structures 2014; 39: 90–117.

DOI: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2014.07.003

Google Scholar

[6] Chen Y, Chen F, Du ZP, Wang Y, Zhao PD, Hua HX. Protective effect of polymer coating on the circular steel plate response to near-field underwater explosion. Marine Structures 2015; 40: 247-266.

DOI: 10.1016/j.marstruc.2014.11.005

Google Scholar

[7] Shin, Y. S, Naval Ship Shock Design and Analysis. Short Course Presented at Chung Cheng Institute of Technology, Aug., (1994).

Google Scholar

[8] Cole, R. H., Underwater Explosion. Princeton University Press, New York, (1948).

Google Scholar

[9] Keil, A. H., The Response of Ships to Underwater Explosion. paper7, The Annual Meeting of the Society of Naval Architect and Marine Engineering, New York, 1961: 366-410m.

Google Scholar

[10] ABAQUS user's and theory manuals, version 6. 11. 1 Dassault Systèmes, RI, USA, (2011).

Google Scholar