Mechanical Properties of Mortar Modified with Cement Treated Tyre Crumb and Oil Palm Fruit Fibre

Article Preview

Abstract:

Addition or replacement of waste tyre in mortars and concretes in lightweight aggregate concrete composites are popular in concrete material research although the mechanical properties of the composite are reduced. Various research studies have been conducted in an effort to improve the mechanical properties of concretes and mortars containing waste tyre particles using chemicals and additives which lead to increase cost. This approach presents an economical and sustainable method, through adding oil palm fruit fibre (OPFF) at 0.5, 1%, and 1.5% by mass of cement content into the matrix and pre-treating the tyre crumb aggregate (0-40%) by volume with cement, in order to improve the properties of the composite. Mechanical properties including compressive strength, split tensile strength and flexural strength were measured on the mortar specimens. Results showed the addition of 0.5% OPFF in 10% treated tyre crumb mortar gives the best improvement in the mechanical strengths of mortar modified with treated tyre crumb.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

225-230

Citation:

Online since:

October 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] G. Li, M.A. Stubblefield, G. Garrick, J. Eggers, C. Abadie, B. Huang, Development of waste tyre modified concrete. Cement and Concrete Research 34(12), 2004, 2283-2289.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.04.013

Google Scholar

[2] P.R. Rangaraju, S. Gadkar, Durability evaluation of crumb rubber addition rate on Portland cement concrete. Clemson University report; (unpublished), (2012).

Google Scholar

[3] F. Pelisser, N. Zavarise, T.A. Longo, A.M. Bernardin, Concrete made with recycled tyre rubber: effect of alkaline activation and silica fume addition. Journal of Cleaner Production 19(6), 2011, 757-763.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.11.014

Google Scholar

[4] L.H. Chou, C.N. Lin, C.K. Lu, C.H. Lee, M.T. Lee, Improving rubber concrete by waste organic sulfur compounds. Waste Management & Research 28(1), 2010, 29-35.

DOI: 10.1177/0734242x09103843

Google Scholar

[5] X. Colom, F. Carrillo, J. Canavate, Composites reinforced with reused tyres: surface oxidant treatment to improve the interfacial compatibility. Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing 38(1), 2007, 44-50.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.01.022

Google Scholar

[6] N. Segre, I. Joekes, Use of tyre rubber particles as addition to cement paste. Cement and Concrete Research 30(9), 2000, 1421-1425.

DOI: 10.1016/s0008-8846(00)00373-2

Google Scholar

[7] Z. Li, F. Li, J. Li, Properties of concrete incorporating rubber tyre particles. Magazine of Concrete Research 50(4), 1998, 297-304.

DOI: 10.1680/macr.1998.50.4.297

Google Scholar

[8] World Growth Palm Oil Green Development Campaign: Palm Oil — The Sustainable Oil a Report by World Growth September 2009. Available on line at <http: /www. worldgrowth. org/assets/files/Palm_Oil. pdf>, (accessed 25 June 2014).

DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105710

Google Scholar

[9] American Society for Testing and Materials, ASTM C109: Standard test method for compressive strength of hydraulic cement mortars (Using 2-in. or [50-mm] cube specimens), 2005, West Conshohocken, PA.

DOI: 10.1520/c0109_c0109m-20

Google Scholar

[10] American Society for Testing and Materials, ASTM C1437: Standard test method for flow of hydraulic cement mortar, 2007, West Conshohocken, PA.

Google Scholar

[11] American Society for Testing and Materials, ASTM C496: Standard specification for split tensile strength of cylindrical concrete specimens, 2004, West Conshohocken, PA.

Google Scholar

[12] American Society for Testing and Materials, ASTM C348: Standard specification for flexural strength of hydraulic-cement mortars, 2008, West Conshohocken, PA.

Google Scholar

[13] Khatib, Z. K., & Bayomy, F. M.,. Rubberized Portland cement concrete. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 11(3), 1999, 206-213.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0899-1561(1999)11:3(206)

Google Scholar