Using Statistical Model of Failure Mode Effect Analysis for Risk Factors in Industrial Logistics

Article Preview

Abstract:

The paper presents Six-Sigma methodologies, which is powerful method for increasing quality and development of manufacturing, by understanding risk factors, can suggest proper and thoughtful decision-making that may protect the business plan from causes. This study examines a framework of improved performance under the possible influence of different failure modes. Econometric verification presents statistical assumptions for the application of estimated procedures in the area of logistics, especially in the area of industrial logistics. The statistical method for the methodology is to test statistical reliability and the significance of estimated parameters for the analysis of numerical values of risk priority.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

113-120

Citation:

Online since:

October 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] A. Arulesvaran, Changing with Lean Six Sigma, Clarion Reviews, (2010).

Google Scholar

[2] M. Bauer, K. Vicek, et al., Kaizen Way to lean and flexible enterprise, BizBooks, Czech Republic, (2012).

Google Scholar

[3] I. Bass, Six Sigma Statistics with Excel and Minitab, McGraw Hill Professional, (2011).

Google Scholar

[4] B. Bertsche, Reliability in automotive and mechanical engineering: determination of component and system reliability, Springer Science & Business Media, (2008).

Google Scholar

[5] F. W. Breyfogle, Implementing Six Sigma: Smarter Solutions Using Statistical Methods, John Wiley & Sons, (2003).

DOI: 10.1002/qre.369

Google Scholar

[6] R. Burlton, Business Process Management: Profiting From Process, Pearson Education, (2001).

Google Scholar

[7] E. Cempirkova, Diploma thesis, University of Pardubice, Pardubice, Czech Republic, (2006).

Google Scholar

[8] A. Chauhan, R.K. Malik, G. Sharma, M. Verma, Performance evaluation of casting industry by FMEA - A case study, In: International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Applications Research, Vol. 2 (2011).

Google Scholar

[9] C. Dougherty, Introduction to Econometrics, Oxford University Press, Oxford, (2011).

Google Scholar

[10] H. Drahotska, I. Drahotsky, Crime in the Logistics, In: LOGI 2010: conference proceeding. Tribun EU, Brno, Czech Republic, (2010).

Google Scholar

[11] M. Dudek-Burlikowska, Application of FMEA method in enterprise focused on quality, In: Journal of Achievements in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering, Vol. 1 (2011) 89-102.

Google Scholar

[12] J. Gasparik, J. Siroky, L. Peceny, M. Halas, Methodology for assessing the quality of rail connections on the network, In: Communications: scientific letters of the University of Zilina, Vol. 2 (2014) 25-30.

DOI: 10.26552/com.c.2014.2.25-30

Google Scholar

[13] L. Hamblenton, Treasure Chest of Six Sigma Growth Methods, Tools, and Best Practices. Pearson Education, (2007).

Google Scholar

[14] R. Hruska, P. Prusa, D. Babic, The use of AHP method for selection of supplier, In: Transport, Vol. 2 (2014) 195-203.

Google Scholar

[15] J. Jaros, V. Melichar, L. Svadlenka, Optimal capital structure as a tool of company competitiveness, In: International multidisciplinary scientific conferences on social sciences & arts, SGEM 2014, Bulgaria, Conference proceedings, Vol. 2 (2014).

DOI: 10.5593/sgemsocial2014/b22/s6.067

Google Scholar

[16] H.J. Johansson, Business Process Reengineering: Breakpoint Strategies for Market, Dominance Wiley, (1993).

Google Scholar

[17] R.M. Khan, Problem Solving and Data Analysis Using Minitab: A Clear and Easy Guide to Six-Sigma Methodology, John Wiley & Sons, (2013).

DOI: 10.1002/9781118307502

Google Scholar

[18] J. Kosturiak, J. Chai, Innovation, your competitive advantage, Computer Press (CPress), Czech Republic, (2008).

Google Scholar

[19] I. Kubasakova, R. Kampf, O. Stopka, Logistics information and communication technology, In: Communications, Vol. 2 (2014) 9-13.

Google Scholar

[20] S. Lesik, Applied Statistical Inference with MINITAB, Taylor & Francis, (2009).

Google Scholar

[21] S.L. Lipol, J. Haq, Risk analysis method: FMEA/FMECA in the organizations, In: International Journal of Basic & Applied Sciences IJBAS-IJENS, 2011, pp.74-81.

Google Scholar

[22] P.G. Mathews, Design of Experiments with MINITAB, ASQ Quality Press, (2005).

Google Scholar

[23] D.S. Moore, The Basic Practice of Statistics, Palgrave Macmillan, (2010).

Google Scholar

[24] S. Narayanagounder, K. Gurusami, A New Approach for Prioritization of Failure Modes in Design FMEA using ANOVA, World Academy of Science, In: Engineering and Technology, Vol. 3 (2009) 1-14.

Google Scholar

[25] A. Rosova, Logistics costs of the enterprise, In: Acta Montanistica Slovaca, Vol. 2 (2007) 121-127.

Google Scholar

[26] N. Sellappan, K. Palanikumar, Modified prioritization methodology for risk priority number in failure mode and effects analysis, In: International Journal of Applied Science and Technology, Vol. 4 (2003).

Google Scholar

[27] N. Sellappan, K. Palanikumar, Development of modified evaluation and prioritization of risk priority number in FMEA, In: International Journal of Engineering (IJE), Vol. 1 (2013).

Google Scholar

[28] A. Sleeper, Six Sigma Distribution Modeling, McGraw Hill Professional, (2006).

Google Scholar

[29] H.W. Stoll, Product Design Methods and Practices, CRC Press, (1999).

Google Scholar

[30] K. Subburaman, A Modified FMEA Approach to enhance reliability of lean systems, Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, (2010).

Google Scholar

[31] A. Svozilova, Business process improvement, Grada Publishing a. s., Czech Republic, (2011).

Google Scholar

[32] M. Solc, Applying of Method FMEA (Failure Mode and Effects Analysis) in the Logistics Process, Department of Integrated Management, Technical University of Kosice, Faculty of Metallurgy, Slovak Republic, Advanced Research in Scientific Areas, (2012).

Google Scholar

[33] J. Vachal, M. Vochozka, Business Management, Grada Publishing a. s., Czech Republic, (2013).

Google Scholar

[34] M. Weske, Business Process Management: Concepts, Languages, Architectures, Springer Science & Business Media, (2012).

Google Scholar

[35] M. Andrejiova, A. Grincova, D. Marasova, G. Fedorko, V. Molnar, Using logistic regression in tracing the significance of rubber-textile conveyor belt damage, In: Measurement: Journal of the International Measurement Confederation, Vol. 1-2 (2014).

DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2014.06.026

Google Scholar

[36] G. Fedorko, V. Molnar, A. Grincova, M. Dovica, T. Toth, N. Husakova, V. Taraba, M. Kelemen, Failure analysis of irreversible changes in the construction of rubber-textile conveyor belt damage by sherp-edge material impact, In: Engineering Failure Analysis, Vol. 39 (2014).

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.01.022

Google Scholar

[37] J. Gasparik, V. Zitricky, A new approach to estimating the occupation time of the railway infrastructure, In: Transport, Vol. 4 (2010) 387-393.

Google Scholar