Selection Tool for Dissimilar Materials Joining

Cristian Ulianov; Kenta Araya; Octavian Lupescu; Ana Badanac

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.809-810.473

Paper Titles

Friction Stir Welding of Composite Materials with Metallic Matrix: A Brief Review
p.449

Investigation on CO and Microparticles Concentrations Produced in MAG-M Welding Process
p.455

Influence of Shielding Gas and Wire Type on the Microparticles Size Generated during MAG Welding Process
p.461

Numerical Simulation of Friction Stir Welding of Aluminum Alloys: A Brief Review
p.467

Selection Tool for Dissimilar Materials Joining
p.473

Edge Effect on Analysis of Residual Stresses in Steel Welded Parts Using Ultrasounds
p.479

The Influence of PCB Mounting/Interconnection Technologies into the Design of a Part
p.486

Design Methodology of Sliders Used in Laminating Tools for Decorative Products
p.492

Testing of Flame Sprayed ZrO₂ Matrix Coatings Containing CaO
p.501

HomeApplied Mechanics and MaterialsApplied Mechanics and Materials Vols. 809-810Selection Tool for Dissimilar Materials Joining

Selection Tool for Dissimilar Materials Joining

Abstract:

Considering the advances of lightweight materials, such as Aluminium, Magnesium and composite materials, as well as their growing use in various applications, the demand for dissimilar materials joining methods is increasing, as more modern hybrid structures in various industries are using these novel materials which need to be joined either between them or with traditional ones. The paper presents the results of a project aimed to develop a simple and efficient tool for the selection of suitable joining methods for a large variety of dissimilar materials, and capable to provide a summary of technical information, including process parameters and limitations, required equipment, joint structural performances, etc. for each selected method. The dissimilar joining selection tool DIJO-S was developed using Excel environment, which is very accessible to most of the users, user friendly and visually attractive by using the functions of Visual Basic. After processing the input data, the selection tool provides not just the summary of the suitable joining methods, but also detailed process fiches, which support the user for selecting the best feasible option.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Innovative Manufacturing Engineering 2015

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 809-810)

Pages:

473-478

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.809-810.473

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

November 2015

Authors:

Cristian Ulianov*, Kenta Araya, Octavian Lupescu, Ana Badanac

Keywords:

Adhesive Joining, Dissimilar Materials, Joining Process, Structural Joints, Welding

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] M.J. Troughton, Handbook of Plastics Joining, William Andrew Publishing, (2008).

Google Scholar

[2] AWS Welding handbook, 8th ed. American welding society, (1991).

Google Scholar

[3] O.M. Akselsen, Diffusion bonding of ceramics, J. of Mat. Sci., 27(3) (1992) 569-579.

Google Scholar

[4] J.G. Bralla, Design for manufacturability handbook, 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, (1999).

Google Scholar

[5] M.F. Ashby, Materials Selection in Mechanical Design, 4th ed., Elsevier, London, (2011).

Google Scholar

[6] Granta Design Limited, CES EduPack 2012 (Version 11. 9. 9) Granta Design Limited.

Google Scholar

[7] A.M.K. Esawi, M.F. Ashby, Computer-based selection of joining processes. Methods, software and case studies, Materials & Design. 25, 7 (2004) 555-564.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2004.03.002

Google Scholar

[8] C. LeBacq, Y. Brechet, H. R. Shercliff, T. Jeggy, L. Salvo, Selection of joining methods in mechanical design, Materials and Design, 23(4) (2002) 405-416.

DOI: 10.1016/s0261-3069(01)00093-0

Google Scholar