Element Free Galerkin Formulation for Problems in Composite Micromechanics

Article Preview

Abstract:

The heterogeneity and anisotropy of structural composites make the application of the standard mesh-based methods using the meshing of interfacial region between matrix and fibers a difficult task. The objective of this study is to present the EFG formulation for problems of composite micromechanics. It is expected that the tediousness and approximations involved in mesh generation, and hence inaccuracies in the results can be avoided using the new meshless techniques such as the Element Free Galerkin (EFG) method. The theoretical methodologies, computer implementations and practical application are carried out. Periodic boundary conditions of the unit cell under tensile load are set up. The method of Lagrange multipliers is introduced for the treatment of material discontinuity at the fiber-matrix interface in which both the displacement continuity and traction reciprocity are satisfied. The EFG method is formulated for the generalized plane strain problems. Examples are presented to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed micromechanical model, and it is validated by comparing the results with available numerical solutions.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

896-901

Citation:

Online since:

November 2015

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2015 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] H.J. Kim, C.C. Swan, Voxel-Based meshing and unit-cell analysis of textile composites, Int. J. Numer. Methods Engng, Vol. 56 (2003), 977–1006.

DOI: 10.1002/nme.594

Google Scholar

[2] T. Belytschko, Y.Y. Lu, L. Gu, Element-free Galerkin methods, Int. J. Numer. Meth. Engng. 37 (1994), 229–256.

DOI: 10.1002/nme.1620370205

Google Scholar

[3] T.D. Dang, B.V. Sankar, Meshless local Petrov–Galerkin for problems in composite micromechanics, AIAA J., 45 (2007), 912–921.

DOI: 10.2514/1.23434

Google Scholar

[4] I. Ahmadi, M. Aghdam, A generalized plane strain Meshless Local Petrov–Galerkin method for the micromechanics of thermomechanical loading of composites, J. Mech. Mater. Struct. 5 (2010), 549 –566.

DOI: 10.2140/jomms.2010.5.549

Google Scholar

[5] D. Hegen, Element-free Galerkin methods in combination with finite element approaches, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 135 (1996), 143-166.

DOI: 10.1016/0045-7825(96)00994-2

Google Scholar

[6] S. Li, W.K. Liu. Meshfree and particle methods and their applications". Appl Mech Rev. 55 (2010), 1-34.

Google Scholar

[7] V.E. Rosca, V.M.A. Leitao, Quasi-Monte Carlo mesh-free integration for meshless weak formulations, Eng, Anal, Bound, Elem. 32 (2008), 471-479.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enganabound.2007.10.015

Google Scholar

[8] V.E. Rosca, V.M.A. Leitao, Numerical implementation of meshless methods for beam problems, Archives of Civil Engineering 58 (2012), 175-184.

DOI: 10.2478/v.10169-012-0010-3

Google Scholar

[9] S. Fernández-Méndez, A. Huerta, Imposing essential boundary conditions in mesh-free methods, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 193 (2004), 1257–1273.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2003.12.019

Google Scholar

[10] N. Naik, Woven fabric composites, in: P.K. Mallick (Eds. ), Composites Engineering Handbook, Technomic Lancaster, PA, USA, 1997, p.247–307.

Google Scholar