[1]
J.L. Peterson, Petri nets, Computing Survey, 9(3) (1977), Department of Computer Sciences, The University of Texas, Austin, Texas 78712.
Google Scholar
[2]
T. Murata, Petrinets: Properties, Analysis and Applications, Proceedings of IEEE, 77(4) (1989) 541-580.
Google Scholar
[3]
Ervin R. Boer, Tadao Murata, Generating Basis Siphons and Traps of Petri Nets using the Sign Incidence Matrix, IEEE Transaction on Circuits and System-I, Fundamental Theory and Application, 41(4) (1994).
DOI: 10.1109/81.285680
Google Scholar
[4]
K. Thirusangu, K. Rangarajan, Marked Graphs and Euler Graphs, Microelectron. Reliab. 37(2) (1997) 225-235.
DOI: 10.1016/s0026-2714(96)00111-4
Google Scholar
[5]
K. Thirusangu, K. Rangarajan, Marked Graphs and Hamiltonian Graphs, Microelectron. Reliab. 37(8) 1243-1250.
DOI: 10.1016/s0026-2714(97)00001-2
Google Scholar
[6]
Maria Pia Fanti and Meng Chu Zhou, Deadlock Control Methods in Automated Manufacturing Systems, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part-A, Systems and Humans, 34(1) (2004).
DOI: 10.1109/tsmca.2003.820590
Google Scholar
[7]
P. Balaji, K. Rangaragan, M. Tamilmozhi, Analysis of Marked Graphs of Flexible Manufacturing System using Sign Incidence Matrix, Proceedings of the International conference (ICMAA-2014) held at University of College Of Engineering, Villupuram, 15-17 December (2014).
Google Scholar
[8]
P. Balaji, K. Rangaragan, M. Tamilmozhi, Analysis of Marked Graphs of Two Machine System Processing Two Part Types Using Sign Incidence Matrix, In the National conference Proceedings NCISE 2014 held at AVIT Chennai on 18 & 19 2014 with ISBN: 978-93-81208-43-4.
Google Scholar
[9]
P. Balaji, K. Rangaragan, M. Tamilmozhi, Analysis of Marked Graphs of an Automated Manufacturing Cell With Three Machines and Three Robots Using Sign Incidence Matrix, National Conference Proceedings CONVERGENCE 2015 held on 20. 03. 2015 & 21. 03. 2015 at Bharath University.
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.813-814.1121
Google Scholar