An Analytical Literature Review of the Available Techniques for Relieving Transmission Line Bottleneck in Deregulated Power Systems

Abstract:

Relieving power transmission line bottleneck is one of the major tasks performed by system operators (SOs) to ensure the operation of transmission system within operating limits. With the advent of electric power market, the relieving bottleneck becomes extremely important challenge and it can impose a barrier to the electricity trading. In order to deal with the challenge, many researchers have recently proposed various techniques. The purpose of the this study is to provide a comprehensive review of the available techniques for relieving bottleneck that are applied to address power transmission line bottleneck issues in in deregulated power systems. The most up to date relevant options are described and categorized into specific clusters. A comparative analysis is carried out in which the advantages and disadvantages to each technique are assessed. Lastly, after the appraisement of the existing bottleneck management techniques, some conclusions and suggestions are put forward for relieving power transmission line bottleneck in the future.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volume 818)
• Pages: 124-128
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.818.124
• Online since: January 2016
• Authors: Abdullah Asuhaimi Mohd Zin, Mehdi Moradi*, Azhar Khairuddin, Mohammad Moradi
• Keywords: Demand Response Programs, Deregulated Power Systems, FACTS Devices, Relieving Bottleneck

References

[1] Christie RD, Wollenberg BF, Wangensteen I. Transmission management in the deregulated environment. Proc IEEE 2000; 88: 170–95.

DOI: 10.1109/5.823997

[2] Kumar A, Srivastava SC, Singh SN. Congestion management in competitive power market: a bibliographical survey. Electr Power Syst Res 2005; 76: 153–64.

DOI: 10.1016/j.epsr.2005.05.001

[3] Acharya N, Mithulananthan N. Locating series FACTS devices for congestion management in deregulated electricity markets. Electr Power Syst Res 2007; 77: 352–60.

DOI: 10.1016/j.epsr.2006.03.016

[4] Besharat H, Taher SA. Congestion management by determining the optimal location of TCSC in deregulated power systems. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 2008; 30: 563–8.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2008.11.001

[5] Nguyen TT, Nguyen VL. Application of wide-area network of phasor measurements of secondary voltage control in power systems with FACTS controllers. In: Power engineering society general meeting, IEEE2005, vol. 3; 2005. p.2927–34.

DOI: 10.1109/pes.2005.1489418

[6] Rahimzadeh S, Tavakoli Bina M. Looking for optimal number and placement of FACTS devices to manage the transmission congestion. Energy Conver Manage 2011; 52: 437–46.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2010.07.019

[7] Singh SN, David AK. Optimal location of FACTS devices for congestion management. Electr Power Syst Res 2001; 58: 71–9.

[8] Ying X, Song YH, Chen-Ching L, Sun YZ. Available transfer capability enhancement using FACTS devices. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2003; 18: 305–12.

DOI: 10.1109/tpwrs.2002.807073

[9] Tuan LA, Bhattacharya K, Daalder J. Transmission congestion management in bilateral markets: an interruptible load auction solution. Electr Power Syst Res 2005; 74: 379–89.

DOI: 10.1016/j.epsr.2004.11.010

[10] Bompard E, Carpaneto E, Chicco G, Gross G. The role of load demand elasticity in congestion management and pricing. In: Power Engineering Society Summer Meeting, IEEE2000, vol. 4; 2000. p.2229–34.

DOI: 10.1109/pess.2000.867338

[11] Singh K, Padhy NP, Sharma J. Congestion management considering hydrothermal combined operation in a pool based electricity market. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 2011; 33: 1513–9.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2011.06.037

[12] Kirschen DS. Demand-side view of electricity markets. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2003; 18: 520–7.

DOI: 10.1109/tpwrs.2003.810692

[13] Strbac G. Demand side management: benefits and challenges. Energy Policy 2008; 36: 4419–26.

DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.030

[14] Albadi MH, El-Saadany EF. Demand response in electricity markets: an overview. In: Power engineering society general meeting, IEEE2007; 2007. P. 1–5.

DOI: 10.1109/pes.2007.385728

[15] Acharya N, Mithulananthan N. Influence of TCSC on congestion and spot price in electricity market with bilateral contract. Electr Power Syst Res2007; 77: 1010–8.

DOI: 10.1016/j.epsr.2006.08.026

[16] Le Anh T, Bhattacharya K. Competitive framework for procurement of interruptible load services. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2003; 18: 889–97.

DOI: 10.1109/tpwrs.2003.810998

[17] Fahrioglu M, Alvarado FL. Designing incentive compatible contracts for effective demand management. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2000; 15: 1255–60.

DOI: 10.1109/59.898098

[18] Aazami R, Aflaki K, Haghifam MR. A demand response based solution for LMP management in power markets. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 2011; 33: 1125–32.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2010.12.018

[19] Affonso CM. Silva LCPd. The potential benefits of implementing load management to improve power system security. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 2010; 32: 704–10.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2010.01.004

[20] Fu X, Wang X. Determination of load shedding to provide voltage stability. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 2011; 33: 515–21.

[21] Sioshansi R, Short W. Evaluating the impacts of real-time pricing on the usage of wind generation. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2009; 24: 516–24.

DOI: 10.1109/tpwrs.2008.2012184

[22] Parvania M, Fotuhi-Firuzabad M. Demand response scheduling by stochastic SCUC. IEEE Trans Smart Grid 2010; 1: 89–98.

DOI: 10.1109/tsg.2010.2046430

[23] Shayesteh E, Yousefi A, Parsa Moghaddam M. A probabilistic risk-based approach for spinning reserve provision using day-ahead demand response program. Energy 2010; 35: 1908–15.

DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2010.01.001

[24] Moura PS, de Almeida AT. Multi-objective optimization of a mixed renewable system with demand-side management. Renew Sust Energy Rev2010; 14: 1461–8.

DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2010.01.004

[25] Billinton R, Lakhanpal D. Impacts of demand-side management on reliability cost/reliability worth analysis. In: IEE Proc – generation, transmission and distribution, vol. 143; 1996. p.225–31.

DOI: 10.1049/ip-gtd:19960190

[26] Bhattacharya K, Bollen MHJ, Daalder JE. Real time optimal interruptible tariff mechanism incorporating utility-customer interactions. IEEE Trans Power Syst 2000; 15: 700–6.

DOI: 10.1109/59.867162

[27] Horowitz I, Woo CK. Designing Pareto-superior demand-response rate options.

[28] Yusta JM, Khodr HM, Urdaneta AJ. Optimal pricing of default customers in electrical distribution systems: effect behavior performance of demand response models. Electr Power Syst Res 2007; 77: 548–58.

DOI: 10.1016/j.epsr.2006.05.001

[29] Roos JG, Lane IE. Industrial power demand response analysis for one-part realtime pricing. IEEE Trans Power Syst 1998; 13: 159–64.

DOI: 10.1109/59.651628