Development of Boundary Layer in CRIACIV in Florence (Prato) and Comparison with CFD

Marek Magát; Ivana Olekšáková; Juraj Žilinský

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.820.359

Paper Titles

Experimental Pressure Measurement on Elliptic Cylinder
p.332

Atmospheric Boundary Layer
p.338

Engineering Standards of Wind
p.345

Atmospheric Boundary Layer Modelling
p.351

Development of Boundary Layer in CRIACIV in Florence (Prato) and Comparison with CFD
p.359

Influence of the Wind in Passages
p.365

Comparison of Pressure Coefficients of Cube Silsoe with the Results in the Wind Tunnel of Faculty of Civil Engineering in Bratislava
p.371

Determination of Fire Resistance of Ceiling Structure Variant Design on the Basis of Timber Using Numerical Calculation Methods
p.379

Fire Safety of Buildings in the Protection Zone of the Electric Power Transmission System of the Czech Republic
p.385

HomeApplied Mechanics and MaterialsApplied Mechanics and Materials Vol. 820Development of Boundary Layer in CRIACIV in...

Development of Boundary Layer in CRIACIV in Florence (Prato) and Comparison with CFD

Abstract:

In this article are described the results from testing profile of atmospheric boundary layer in BLWT (Boundary layer wind tunnel) in Florence (Prato), Italy with emphasis on comparison of the results with simulations in CFD (Computational fluid dynamics) software OpenFoam. The values are compared with calculated values from EuroCode.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Advanced Architectural Design and Construction

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volume 820)

Pages:

359-364

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.820.359

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

January 2016

Authors:

Marek Magát*, Ivana Olekšáková, Juraj Žilinský

Keywords:

Boundary Layer Wind Tunnel in Florence, Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] HUBOVÁ O., OLEKSAKOVA I.:. Comparison of Various Turbulence Models, 13th international scientific conference VSU 2013. Volume 1: Proceeding. Sofia, Bulgaria. 6. -7. 6. 2013 pp.145-149, ISBN.

Google Scholar

[2] Bielek, Milan- Černík, Peter- Tajmír, Mirko. Aerodynamika budov: Fyzikálne problem účinkov vetra na budovy a ich okolie. Bratislava: Vydavateľstvo ALFA, 1990. 192s.

Google Scholar

[3] STN EN 1991-1-4 Eurokód 1. Zaťaženia konštrukcií. Časť 1-4: Všeobecné zaťaženia. Zaťaženia vetrom. 2007ČSN.

Google Scholar

[4] OLEKŠÁKOVÁ, I. – MAGÁT, M.: Modeling of 2D Circular Cylinder in Ansys by Using Turbulence Models. The Experiment Preparation. In: New Trends in Statics and Dynamics of Buildings, October 3 - 4, 2013, Svf STU Bratislava, pp.157-160.

Google Scholar

[5] Hubová, Oľga. Aeroelasticita: Vydavateľstvo Jaga, 2012. 90 s.

Google Scholar

[6] MiniCTA a basic guide, Dantec Dynamics, 2004 23s.

Google Scholar

[7] JIRSÁK, Milan. 2010. Aerodynamický návrh větrního tunelu pro STU Bratislava, Príloha 4, 5- Aplikace terénu. Praha, (2010).

Google Scholar

[8] DANTECdynamics. Constant Temperature Anemometry and Particle Image Velocimetry.

Google Scholar

[9] ŠOCH, P – VRÁTNÝ, J. 1987 Experimentální metody v mechanice tekutin I, ČVUT, Praha.

Google Scholar

[10] OLEKSAKOVA I.: Modelovanie prúdenia pri obtekaní valca, Juniorstav 2013, Conference VUT Brno, 7. 2. 2013, ISBN 978-80-214-4670-0.

Google Scholar