Potential of Vegetation in Improving Indoor Thermal Comfort and Natural Ventilation

Abstract:

According to the EPBD (2010) whilst improving the thermal performance of buildings good or at least tolerable thermal comfort conditions must be provided. But better thermal insulation and more airtight buildings increase the risk of summer overheating which makes mechanical cooling inevitable. This idea has been verified by the tendency of the last decade, when people were willing to install and use more frequently air conditioning devices during the summer heatwaves – increasing their energy consumption and electricity bills at the same time. We cannot neglect the importance of studies triggering an efficient way to minimise the cooling load of residential buildings by obstructing solar radiation. The usage of plants in front of transparent surfaces of the façade can avoid indoor overheating. Deciduous plants obstruct buildings’ solar access so that the microclimate around the building is improved too. The use of Green Infrastructure in different levels of planning processes, which would provide sustainable solutions for urban management, is also prescribed in the EU Biodiversity Strategy 2020. Of course in order to investigate the actual effect of trees on indoor thermal comfort we should take into consideration a list of other factors: such as orientation the type and thermal properties of the windows / transparent structures used, and the thermal transmittance values and heat storage capacity of the building. If we have taken into consideration the mentioned factors during simulation we can prove the effectiveness of vegetation for each case. Simulations are made on the base of transparency measurements carried out during the summer of 2014. The shading efficiency of trees is a species-specific attribute because of the varying crown structure and leaf density. Our analyses aimed at the quantification of the transmissivity of characteristic individuals of three frequently planted species (Celtis occidentalis, Sophora japonica, Tilia cordata). The measured data were the amount of transmitted shortwave radiation, compared with a measurement point under unobstructed sunlight. In preliminary studies we have shown that depending on species – a tree in front of the façade can decrease the solar gain on internal horizontal surface up to ~18-30 per cents. As the tree obstructs the solar access of the wall and that of transparent surfaces, a difference in indoor comfort is to be observed too.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volume 824)
• Pages: 278-287
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.824.278
• Online since: January 2016
• Authors: Flóra Szkordilisz*, Márton Kiss
• Keywords: Cooling Load, Energetic Effects of Vegetation, Energy-Efficiency, Indoor Comfort, Urban Green Spaces

References

[1] J. Unger, Zs. Bottyán, Z. Sümeghy, Á. Gulyás, Urban heat island development affected by urban surface factors, Időjárás 104 (2000) 253-268.

[2] J. Unger, Urban-rural air humidity differences in Szeged, Hungary, Int. J. Climatol. 19 (1999) 1509-1515.

DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0088(19991115)19:13<1509::aid-joc453>3.0.co;2-p

[3] T. Gál, J. Unger, Detection of ventilation paths using high-resolution roughness parameter mapping in a large urban area, Build. Env. 44 (2009) 198-206.

DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2008.02.008

[4] H. Akbari, H. Taha, The Impact of Trees and White Surfaces On Residential Heating and Cooling Energy Use in Four Canadian Countries, Energy 17 (1992) 141-149.

DOI: 10.1016/0360-5442(92)90063-6

[5] J.R. Simpson, E.G. McPherson, Potential of tree shade for reducing residential energy use in California, J. Arboric. 22 (1996) 10-18.

DOI: 10.48044/jauf.1996.002

[6] G.M. Heisler, D.T. Harrje, C.E. Buckley, Planning and arrangement of tree windbreaks for reducing air infiltration energy losses, 14th Conference on agriculture and forest meteorology and 4th conference on biometeorology - April 2-6, 1979 Minneapolis, MN. Boston, American Meteorological Society, 123-125.

[7] P. Bolund, S. Hunhammar, Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecol. Econ. 29 (1999) 293-301.

DOI: 10.1016/s0921-8009(99)00013-0

[8] S. Streiling, A. Matzarakis, Influence of single and small clusters of trees on the bioclimate of a city: a case study, J. Arboric. 29 (2003) 309-316.

DOI: 10.48044/jauf.2003.037

[9] L.A. Égerházi, A. Kovács, J. Unger, Application of microclimate modelling and onsite survey in planning practice related to an urban micro environment, Adv. Meteorol. (2013) 251586.

DOI: 10.1155/2013/251586

[10] D.J. Nowak, D.E. Crane, J.C. Stevens, Air pollution removal by urban trees and shrubs in the United States, Urban For. Urban Gree. 4 (2006) 115-123.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2006.01.007

[11] E.G. McPherson, Q. Xiao, E. Aguaron, A new approach to quantify and map carbon stored, sequestered and emissions avoided by urban forests, Landscape Urban Plan. 120 (2013) 70-84.

DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.08.005

[12] A.L. Soares, F.C. Rego, E.G. McPherson, J.R. Simpson, P.J. Peper, Q. Xiao, Benefits and costs of street trees in Lisbon, Portugal, Urban For. Urban Gree. 10 (2011) 69–78.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2010.12.001

[13] A.J. Pothier, A.A. Millward, Valuing trees on city-centre institutional land: an opportunity for urban forest management. J. Environ. Plann. Man. 56 (2013) 1380-1402.

DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2012.724666

[14] European Commission, Our life insurance, our natural capital: an EU biodiversity strategy to 2020, COM(2011) 244, Brussels, (2011).

[15] E.G. McPherson, J.R. Simpson, Carbon dioxide reduction through urban forestry: Guidelines for professional and volunteer tree planters, Gen. Tech. Rep. PSWGTR-171, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, (1999).

DOI: 10.2737/psw-gtr-171

[16] Center for Neighborhood Technology, The Value of Green Infrastructure – A Guide to Recognizing Its Economic, Environmental and Social Benefits http: /www. americanrivers. org/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/Value-of-Green-Infrastructure. pdf?506914 (downloaded: 2014. 06. 30. ).

[17] E. McPherson, J.R. Simpson, P.J. Peper, S.L. Gardner, K.E. Vargas, S.E. Maco, Q. Xiao, Midwest Community Tree Guide: Benefits, Costs, and Strategic Planting, Gen. Tech. Rep. PSW-GTR-199, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Forest Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, (2006).

DOI: 10.2737/psw-gtr-199

[18] https: /www. smud. org/en/residential/environment/shade-trees/benefit-estimator. htm (downloaded: 2014. 06. 30. ).

[19] J. Konarska, F. Lindberg, A. Larsson, S. Thorsson, B. Holmer, Transmissivity of solar radiation through crowns of single urban trees - application for outdoor thermal comfort modelling, Theor. Appl. Climatol. 117 (2014) 363-376.

DOI: 10.1007/s00704-013-1000-3

[20] R. Berry, S.J. Livesley, L. Aye, Tree canopy shade impacts on solar irradiance received by building walls and their surface temperature, Build. Env. 69 (2013) 91-100.

DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.07.009

[21] F. Szkordilisz, N. Heeren, G. Habert, 2014. Energetic and comfort benefits of composite buildings. Learning from vernacular techniques: Section 16, In: Creating New Resources, Conference Proceedings: Session 16, World Sustainable Building Conference (WSB14), Barcelona, 2014, Green Building Council - Espana, 2014, pp.9-15.