Resistance Spot Welding Process Optimization Using Taguchi Robust Method for Joining Dissimilar Material

Article Preview

Abstract:

Steel sheet joining were dominantly by resistance spot welding (RSW) method. It is the most implemented in automotive mass production in which the heat is applied to the materials. Joining different material with different properties is a challenge. Thicker material needs more current and time. Meanwhile, the thinner material may burn and weaken if the excessive parameters apply. The purpose of this study is to identify the optimum spot weld parameters for joining dissimilar materials with different thickness that involve high tensile strength steel and low carbon steel in the automotive application. In this study, weld parameters with varying electrode forces, welding currents, and welding times are analyzed by applying a Taguchi robust method for the design of experiment (DOE). The L9 orthogonal array has been chosen due to the particular material specimen and time constraint. In the analysis, the higher value of signal-to-noise (S/N) ratio indicates the good responses of testing parameter when the level changed. Base of the plotted S/N ratio graph for each factor, Taguchi robust method has suggested that A3 (5000V), B3 (25 cycle), and C2 (150N) as the optimum weld parameters. The confirmation test afterward, finally proved that the Taguchi robust method was a liable DOE method and has been successfully optimized the spot weld parameters.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

248-253

Citation:

Online since:

May 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2016 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Miller Welds Handbook, HANDBOOK FOR Resistance Spot Welding, (2012) 1–9.

Google Scholar

[2] W. Liu, C. Sun, X. Xu, Y. Zuo, J. Lin, The influences of nugget diameter on the mechanical properties and the failure mode of resistance spot-welded metastable austenitic stainless steel, Mater. Des. 33 (2012) 292–299.

DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.06.071

Google Scholar

[3] U. Esme, Application of Taguchi Method for the Optimization of Resistance Spot Welding Process, Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 34(2) (2009) 519–528.

Google Scholar

[4] A.G. Thakur, T.E. Rao, M.S. Mukhedkar, V.M. Nandedkar, Application of Taguchi Method for Resistance Spot Welding of Galvanized Steel, ARPN J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 5(11) (2010) 22–26.

Google Scholar

[5] N. Muhammad, Y.H.P. Manurung, M. Hafidzi, S.K. Abas, G. Tham, M.R.A. Rahim, A Quality Improvement Approach for Resistance Spot Welding using Multi-objective Taguchi Method and Response Surface Methodology, Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol. 2(3) (2012).

DOI: 10.18517/ijaseit.2.3.189

Google Scholar

[6] N.K. Singh, Y. Vijayakumar, Application of Taguchi method for optimization of resistance spot welding of austenitic stainless steel AISI 301L, Innovat. Syst. Des. Eng. 3(10) (2012) 49-62.

Google Scholar

[7] S. Athreya, Y.D. Venkatesh, Application Of Taguchi Method For Optimization Of Process Parameters In Improving The Surface Roughness Of Lathe Facing Operation, Int. Refereed J. Eng. Sci. (IRJES), 1(3) (2012) 13–19.

Google Scholar

[8] W.Y. Fowlkes, C.M. Creveling, Engineering Methods for Robust Product Design Using Taguchi Methods in Technology and Product Development. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, (1995).

DOI: 10.1177/1063293x9600400109

Google Scholar

[9] S. Phoenix, A. Group, An Experimental Study of Resistance Spot Welding In 1mm Thick Sheet of Low Carbon Steel, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part B: J. Eng. Manuf. 210(4) (1996) 341-347.

Google Scholar

[10] A Thakur, V. Nandedkar, Optimization of the Resistance Spot Welding Process of Galvanized Steel Sheet Using the Taguchi Method. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. (Springer Sci. Bus. Media B.V. ) 39 (2014) 1171–1176.

DOI: 10.1007/s13369-013-0634-x

Google Scholar

[11] Y.S. Choi, S.M. Yun, Y.J. Cho, S.H. Rhee, A Study on the Crash Characteristics and Analysis of Spot adhesive Welds in Automobile B-pillar Parts, J. Weld. Joining. Soc. 29 (2011) 570–579.

DOI: 10.5781/kwjs.2011.29.5.570

Google Scholar