Tempering Process Gradually to Improve Quality Tool

Article Preview

Abstract:

Tempering is a heating treatment process to improve the elasticity with a little hardness. It is reheating the steel that has been hardened under the critical temperature of 723 oC and applying a holding time at that temperature, then cooling the steel in the air outside. The hardening was followed by gradual tempering process at different temperatures of 650°C, 550 oC and 450°C at 60, 120, and 180-minute holding times. The tempering process resulted in hard and tough not easily broken or worn tool steel. Besides, it improves the tensile strength and increases the durability of tool against collision. Tukey, Fisher Pairwise Comparison and Dunnet Method were applied to obtain Grouping Information data of 93%. Observations on eight tempering treatment processes show not only treatments 4, 5 and 6 (tempering with time delay) but also gradual tempering (in which the process was done some times by gradually dropping the temperature) resulted in better performance. Further observation was conducted in terms of the variation of dropping temperature and the most optimum holding time of the tempering process. Processes 7 and 8 (tempering without time delay) are not recommended, as the hardness value drops sharply, high vibration occurs when machining, and the cutting results in high roughness value.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

153-158

Citation:

Online since:

June 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2016 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Budak. E, Kivanc, Structural Modeling of End Mills for Form Error and Stability Analysis, International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture 44 (2004) 1151–1161.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2004.04.002

Google Scholar

[2] Callister, Material Science and Engineering, an Introduction, Wiley and Sons (2000).

Google Scholar

[3] Hayajneh Mohammed T, Montasser S. Tahat b, Joachim Bluhm, A Study of the Effects of Machining Parameters on the Surface Roughness in the End-Milling Process. Jordan Journal of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, Volume 1, Number 1 (2007).

Google Scholar

[4] Jin Kim Su, Short and safe tool setting by safe space in NC machining. Int J Adv Manuf (2007).

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-006-0526-2

Google Scholar

[5] Lela B, Zivkovi D, D. Baji, Modeling of Machined Surface Roughness and Optimization Of Cutting Parameters In Face Milling, Metabk 47(4), (2008) 331-334.

Google Scholar

[6] Raksiri Chana, Manukid Parnichkun, Geometric and force errors compensation in a 3-axis CNC milling machine, International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture 44 (2004) pp.1283-1291.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2004.04.016

Google Scholar

[7] Randelovic Sasa, Sasa Zivanovic, CAD - CAM Data Transfer as a Part of Product Life Cycle. Series: Mechanical Engineering Vol. 5, No 1, (2007) pp.87-96.

Google Scholar

[8] RSNI T-03-2005, SNI Standar Nasional Indonesia.

Google Scholar

[9] Saffar R. Jalili, M.R. Razfar, A.H. Salimi and M.M. Khani. Optimization of Machining Parameter to Minimize Tool Deflection in the End Milling Operation Using Genetic Algrithm. World Applied Sciences Journal 6 (1), (2009) 64-69.

DOI: 10.1080/10910340903586483

Google Scholar