Enhanced Electrokinetic Removal of Heavy Metals in MSWI Fly Ash Assisted by Cation Exchange Membranes

Article Preview

Abstract:

Since MSWI fly ash enriches heavy metals and many toxic components and these components would potentially leach when the ashes are land filled, it is regulated as hazardous waste in many countries. Electrokinetic removal, an electrochemically assisted extraction method, has recently been adopted as a new method for removal of heavy metals from MSWI fly ashes. But the generation of metal hydroxide precipitation near the cathode decreased conductivity of electrokinetic removal system and limited metal extraction from the sample area. In this study, cation exchange membrane was used in electrokinetic removal experiment to improve this method. After 192 hours of electrokinetic removal, about 15%Cd,20%Pb, 30% Zn, and 10% As was removed from 2.850kg MSWI fly ash. It showed positive effect compared to the trial test. But there still exists some problems, such as low removal efficiency. Further work should be done to solve it.Moreover, the high conductivity in fly ash limits the current , which in turn causes low electroosmotic flow. While electroosmotic flow is the main factor leting the heavy meatals release from fly ash, it would become the focus in further experiment to look for ways increasing the electroosmotic flow in sample cell.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

626-630

Citation:

Online since:

August 2011

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Kosson D. S., van der Sloot H. A. and Eighmy T. T.: Journal of Hazardous Materials Vol. 47(1996), p.43.

Google Scholar

[2] Huang B., Liu Q. and Wang L. a.: Techniques and Equipment for Environmental Pollution Vol. 47(2003), p.43~75.

Google Scholar

[3] Zhang Y., Jiang J. and Chen M.: Journal of Environmental Sciences Vol. 20(2008), p.1398.

Google Scholar

[4] Xu J. Z., Zhou Y. L., Chang Q. et al.: Materials Letters Vol. 60(2006), p.820.

Google Scholar

[5] Zhang Y., Chi Y. and Li X.: Thermal Power Generation Vol. 34(2005), p.25~29.

Google Scholar

[6] Luo Y. and Shi Y.: THERMAL POWER GENERATION Vol. 33(2004), p.249~258.

Google Scholar

[7] Jung C. H. and Matsuto T.: Waste Management Vol. 30(2005), p.301~305.

Google Scholar

[8] De Casa G., Mangialardi T., Paolini A. E. et al.: Waste Management Vol. 27(2007), p.238.

Google Scholar

[9] Youcai Z., Lijie S. and Guojian L.: Journal of Hazardous Materials Vol. 95(2002), p.47.

Google Scholar

[10] Sakai S. -i. and Hiraoka M.: Waste Management Vol. 20(2000), p.249.

Google Scholar

[11] Hong K. -J., Tokunaga S. and Kajiuchi T.: Journal of Hazardous Materials Vol. 75(2000), p.57.

Google Scholar

[12] Shun-gui Z., Pei H. and Fa-mao L.: RESEARCH OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Vol. 19(2006), p.82~86.

Google Scholar

[13] Xiu F. -R. and Zhang F. -S.: Journal of Hazardous Materials Vol. 170(2009), p.191.

Google Scholar

[14] Pedersen A. J.: Journal of Hazardous Materials Vol. 95(2002), p.185.

Google Scholar

[15] Virkutyte J., Sillanp M. and Latostenmaa P.: The Science of The Total Environment Vol. 289(2002), p.97.

Google Scholar

[16] Zhou D. -M., Deng C. -F. and Cang L.: Chemosphere Vol. 56(2004), p.265.

Google Scholar