Towards a Modular and Wearable Support System for Industrial Production

Abstract:

Despite the increasing degree of automation many tasks are still performed manually, especially in production of individualized, sensitive or quality critical products. These tasks, e.g. tasks in or above head level, are often non ergonomic. Thus musculoskeletal diseases can occur. This paper presents a novel concept for a modular and wearable technical support system for reducing musculoskeletal stress. The support system which is based on the approach of Human Hybrid Robot (HHR) can be adapted easily to different users and activities. The system emphasizes on modularity and the use of soft materials for kinematic elements and interfaces in order to gain higher flexibility and increased human safety. The basic idea can be applied to various applications. The focus lies on a functional support system prototype for upper extremities. It comprises a Human-Machine-Interface using a vest equipped with soft kinematic elements as well as a control unit. Moreover, results from a biomechanical case study will be illustrated in order to confirm the ergonomic improvements, especially the comparison of the range of motion and the musculoskeletal stress during tasks.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volume 840)
• Pages: 123-131
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.840.123
• Online since: June 2016
• Authors: Robert Weidner*, Tobias Meyer, Andreas Argubi-Wollesen, Jens P. Wulfsberg
• Keywords: Biomechanical Analysis, Ergonomic Improvements, Human-Centered Systems, Human-Machine-Interaction, Soft Robots, Wearable Support Technology

References

[1] J. Schmidtler, C. Hölzel, V. Knott, K. Bengler, Human centered assistance applications for production, in: 5th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics, Poland, pp.380-391, (2014).

DOI: 10.54941/ahfe100459

[2] R. Weidner, Z. Yao, J. P. Wulfsberg, R. A. Goehlich, S. Mehler, Modular Support Systems for Air- and Spacecraft Industry, in: Band zur ersten Transdisziplinären Konferenz Technische Unterstützungssysteme, die die Menschen wirklich wollen, pp.347-358, (2014).

[3] M. Kagerer, M. Huedig, T. C. Lueth, F. Irlinger, Manual microassembly system with integrated squeegee device for homogenous and defined adhesive layers for bimorph piezoelectric actuators using in drop-on-demand techniques, in: Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO), 2013 IEEE International Conference on Date of Conference, pp.1911-1917, (2013).

DOI: 10.1109/robio.2013.6739748

[4] A. Karafillidis, R. Weidner, Grundlagen einer Theorie und Klassifikation technischer Unterstützung, in: R. Weidner, T. Redlich, J. P. Wulfsberg (Eds. ), Technische Unterstützungssysteme, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp.66-89, (2015).

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-48383-1_2

[5] R. Weidner, A. Karafillidis, Three General Determinants of Support-Systems, in: Applied Me-chanics and Materials Vol. 794, pp.555-562, Trans Tech Publications, Schweiz, (2015).

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.794.555

[6] K. Ogushi, A. Nishino, K. Maeda, K. Ueda, Calibration chain for hand torque screwdrivers, in: Proceedings of SICE Annual Conference (SICE), pp.1471-1476, (2012).

DOI: 10.21014/acta_imeko.v4i2.226

[7] S. Bruno, O. Khatib, Springer handbook of robotics, Springer Science+Business Media, Berlin, (2008).

[8] G. Reinhart, J. Werner, F. Lange, Robot based system for automation of flow assembly lines, in: Prod. Eng. Res. Dev. 3: 121 - 126, (2009).

DOI: 10.1007/s11740-008-0143-z

[9] C. Thomas, F. Busch, B. Kuhlenkötter, J. Deuse, Ensuring Human Safety with Offline Simulation and Real-time Workspace Surveillance to Develop a Hybrid Robot Assistance System for Welding of Assemblies, in: Enabling Manufacturing Competitiveness and Economic Sustainability, Springer, pp.464-470, (2011).

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-23860-4_76

[10] D. M. Lucke, Ad hoc information acquisition using context aware systems within the multi-variant manufacturing, dissertation, Stuttgart, Fraunhofer-Verl., (2014).

[11] A. B. Zoss, H. Kazerooni, A. Chu, Biomechanical design of the Berkeley lower extremity exoskeleton (BLEEX), in: Transactions on Mechatronics, IEEE/ASME, vol. 11, no. 2, pp.128-138, (2006).

DOI: 10.1109/tmech.2006.871087

[12] R. Weidner, N. Kong, J. P. Wulfsberg, Human Hybrid Robot: a new concept for supporting manual assembly tasks, Prod. Eng. Res., vol. 7, no. 6, pp.675-684, (2013).

DOI: 10.1007/s11740-013-0487-x

[13] R. Weidner, A. Karafillidis, J. P. Wulfsberg, Individual Support in Industrial Production – Outline of a Theory of Support-Systems, in: 49th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp.1-10, (2016).

DOI: 10.1109/hicss.2016.77

[14] R. Weidner, J. P. Wulfsberg, Concept and exemplary realization of Human Hybrid Robot for supporting manual assembly tasks, in: Procedia CIRP 23 (2014), pp.53-58, Conference on Assembly Technologies and Systems.

DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2014.10.096

[15] G. Kamen, D. A. Gabriel, Essentials of electromyography, Human Kinetics, (2010).

[16] Plug-in Gait, The standard Vicon full body model (Plug-in Gait) Marker Placement Scheme; http: /www. idmil. org/mocap/Plug-in-Gait+Marker+Placement. pdf, called on December 21th (2015).

DOI: 10.7717/peerj.8006/supp-2