Protective Structure Design against Airblast Effect

Jiří Štoller; Petr Dvořák

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.843.93

Paper Titles

Improving the Efficiency of Artificial Ground Freezing in Urban Underground Construction by Using Solid Carbon Dioxide
p.65

Mathematical Model of the Painting Robot
p.72

Influence of Pipe Ramming on Stress State of Surrounding Soil and Nearby Tunnel Lining
p.81

Relation of Construction Works to Water Quality
p.87

Protective Structure Design against Airblast Effect
p.93

The Effect of Redistribution of the Mixing Water of the Concrete Lining on its Quality
p.103

Environment Effects - Dust Pollution and Soil Protection
p.111

Contact Laser-Ultrasonic Evaluation of Residual Stress
p.118

New System of Ice Wall Strength Increase
p.125

HomeApplied Mechanics and MaterialsApplied Mechanics and Materials Vol. 843Protective Structure Design against Airblast...

Protective Structure Design against Airblast Effect

Abstract:

In the Army of the Czech Republic, the protective structure design is currently regulated by a military standard Žen 2-1/1, mainly for buried structures and against nuclear loads. As the nature of current armed conflicts suggests, it would be more appropriate to design above-ground protective structures exposed to the effects of direct or indirect fire weapons. The paper describes a search for an ideal above-ground structural shape exposed to an airblast. Several shapes were designed and their behavior under a typical airblast loading was tested using ANSYS software. As a result of the analysis, the most suitable shape of a protection structure was designed.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Design, Construction and Safety of Underground Structures

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volume 843)

Pages:

93-102

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.843.93

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

July 2016

Authors:

Jiří Štoller, Petr Dvořák*

Keywords:

Airblast, Interaction, Protective Structure, Shock Wave

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] NATO Standardization Agency. STANAG 2280 Design threat levels and handover procedures for temporary protective structures. Brusel, Belgie, (2008).

Google Scholar

[2] Žen 2-1/1: Polní opevňování. In: Praha: Ministerstvo národní obrany, (1972).

Google Scholar

[3] P. Maňas, L. Kroupa, The Blast Effects Simulation Tools within Force Protection Engineering and Critical Infrastructure Security. Drilling and Blasting Technology, 2012, vol. 2012, no. September, pp.42-48. ISSN 1788-5671.

Google Scholar

[4] J. Henrych. Dynamika výbuchu a její užití. První. Praha: Academia, nakladatelství Československé akademie věd, 1973. ISBN 509-21-875.

Google Scholar

[5] L. Figuli, D. Papan. Single degree of freedom analysis of steel beams under blast loading. In: Applied mechanics and materials. - ISSN 1660-9336. - Vol. 617 (2014), s. 92-95.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.617.92

Google Scholar

[6] A. Kravtsov, P. Svoboda. Experimental Studies of the Blast Pressure due to an Explosion in the tunnel. 6th Intern. Symposium on Tunnel Safety and Security, Marseille, France.

Google Scholar