Analysis of the Effects of Mortar Thickness and Wall Building Technique in Masonry Structures Using an Anisotropic Model

Abstract:

The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of mortar/unit thickness ratio and unit configuration on the masonry wall behaviour and on masonry structure modelling. Firstly, five wall models with different mortar/unit thickness ratios and with different sizes of units are micro-modelled by using SAP2000 software. The results of these walls are used to obtain the material properties of anisotropic macro-models in vertical and horizontal directions. Secondly, a sample unreinforced masonry structure is simulated by the same software using anisotropic material properties. Earthquake loading is applied following the Turkish seismic code. Responses of these five structure models are compared with each other and also with their isotropic modelled counterparts. It is observed that isotropic modelling overestimates the rigidity of the structure around 3-5% for low mortar/unit thickness ratios, but underestimates the rigidity around 5-7% for high mortar/unit thickness ratios

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volume 847)
• Pages: 146-155
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.847.146
• Online since: July 2016
• Authors: Bahattin Kimence, Samed Demirkan, Hale Ergun*
• Keywords: Homogenization, Isotropic versus Anisotropic Modelling, Macro Model, Micro Model, Mortar Thickness, Mortar Thickness Ratio, Unit Thickness Ratio, Unreinforced Masonry

References

[1] P.B. Lourenco, Computational strategies for masonry structures, PhD Dissertation, The Netherlands, Delft University of Technology, (1996).

[2] P.B. Lourenco, Experimental and numerical issues in the modelling of the mechanical behavior of masonry, Structural Analysis of Historical Constructions II, CIMNE, Barcelona, Spain, 4-6 November (1998).

[3] P.B. Lourenco, Current experimental and numerical issues in masonry research, in Proceedings of the International Workshop on Masonry Walls and Earthquakes, Universidade do Minho, Guimaraes, Portugal, 2004, pp.119-136.

[4] O. Damanli, Determination of the earthquake performance of historical masonry structures (in Turkish), Masters Thesis, Istanbul Technical University, Turkey, (2008).

[5] G.O. Ozen, Comparison of elastic and inelastic behavior of historical masonry structures at the low load levels, MS Dissertation, METU, Ankara, Turkey, (2006).

[6] A. Bayraktar, Evolution of masonry structure engineering history, Beta Publications, (in Turkish), Istanbul, Turkey, (2011).

[7] M. Ispir, C. Demir, A. Ilki and N. Kumbasar, Material characterization of the historical unreinforced masonry Akaretler row houses in Istanbul, Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 22 (2010) No. 7, pp.702-713.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0000071

[8] L. Binda, C. Tedeschi and G. Baronio, Mechanical behaviour at different ages of masonry prisms with thick mortar joints reproducing a Byzantine masonry, 8th North American Masonry Conference, NAMC, Austin, USA, (1999).

[9] EN 1996-1-1: Eurocode 6: Design of masonry structures - Part 1-1: General rules for reinforced and unreinforced masonry structures, (2005).

DOI: 10.3403/30092858u

[10] Z. Celep, Explanations and examples handbook of Turkish Seismic Code on Specifications for structures to be built in disaster areas 2007, IPKB Istanbul Project Coordination Unit, Republic of Turkey Istanbul Governorship, ISMEP Istanbul Seismic Risk Mitigation and Emergency Preparedness Project, Istanbul, Turkey, (in Turkish), retrieved on Feb 28th, 2015 from (http: /www. ipkb. gov. tr/ismep/ElKitabi. html).

DOI: 10.1061/41084(364)103

[11] Turkish Seismic Code, Specifications for structures to be built in disaster areas, Ministry of Reconstruction and Resettlement, Turkish Government, Ankara, Turkey, (2007).