Mass and Stiffness Matrices Updating Using the First Modal Data

Abstract:

This paper presents a new direct approach to simultaneously update the analytical mass and stiffness matrices in an undamped model .First, we assume that the difference between the finite element model and the real model is little. Second, only by utilizing the first order modal data orthogonal normalization conditions and eigen equations , we derive the updated matrices. Third, the method can maintain matrices symmetry and sparsity and preserve system connectivity. The merit of the proposed method is simple and accurate in a practical engineering computation. Finally,a numerical example is given to demonstrate the accuracy and effectiveness of the presented updating method.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volume 851)
• Pages: 834-839
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.851.834
• Online since: August 2016
• Authors: Shi Qi Li, Zhe Zhang, Shi Ping Liu*, Heng Zhang
• Keywords: Connectivity, Direct Matrices Method, First Modal Data Symmetry, Mass Matrices Updating, Sparsity, Stiffness Matrices Updating

References

[1] Y. B. Yang, Y. J. Chen, A new direct method for updating structural models based on measured modal data, Eng. Struct. 31(1) (2009) 32-42.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.07.011

[2] S. L. J. Hu, H. J. Li, S. Q. Wang, Cross-model cross-mode method for model updating, Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 21(4) (2007) 1690–1703.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2006.07.012

[3] J. E. Mottershead, M. I. Friswell, Model updating in structural dynamics: a survey, J. Sound Vib. 167(2) (1993) 347–375.

DOI: 10.1006/jsvi.1993.1340

[4] J. Carvalho, B. N. Datta, W. Lin, C. Wang, Symmetry preserving eigenvalue embedding in finite element model updating of vibration structures, J. Sound Vib. 290(3-5) (2006) 839–864.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2005.04.030

[5] Y. C. Kuo, W. W. Lin, S. F. Xu, New methods for finite element model updating problems, AIAA J. 44(6) (2006) 1310–1316.

DOI: 10.2514/1.15654

[6] A. Berman, Mass matrix correction using an incomplete set of measured modes, AIAA J. 17(10) (1979) 1147-1148.

DOI: 10.2514/3.61290

[7] M. Baruch, Optimization procedure to correct stiffness and flexibility matrices using vibration tests, AIAA J. 16(11) (1978) 1208-1210.

DOI: 10.2514/3.61032

[8] A. Berman, E. J. Nagy, Improvement of a large analytical model using test data, AIAA J. 21(8) (1983) 1168-1173.

DOI: 10.2514/3.60140

[9] A. M. Kabe, Stiffness matrix adjustment using mode data, AIAA J. 23(9) (1985) 1431-1436.

DOI: 10.2514/3.9103

[10] P. G. Bakir, E. Reynders, G. De Roeck, Sensitivity-based finite element model updating using constrained optimization with a trust region algorithm, J. Sound Vib. 305(1-2) (2007) 211–225.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2007.03.044

[11] F. Charbel, M. H. Francois, Updating finite element dynamic models using an element-by element sensitivity methodology, AIAA J. 31(9) (1993) 1702–1711.

DOI: 10.2514/3.11833

[12] J. E. Mottershead, M. Link, M. I. Friswell, The sensitivity method in finite element model updating: a tutorial, Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 25(7) (2011) 2275–2296.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.03.009

[13] M. Imregun, W. J. Visser, D. J. Ewins, Finite element model updating using frequency response function data – I: theory and initial investigation, Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 9(2) (1995) 187–202.

DOI: 10.1006/mssp.1995.0015

[14] A. Esfandiari, F. Bakhtiari-Nejad, M. Sanayei, A. Rahai, Structural finite element model updating using transfer function data, Comput. Struct. 88(1-2) (2010) 54–64.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2009.09.004

[15] J. Carvalhoa, B. N. Datta, A. Guptac, M. Lagadapati, A direct method for model updating with incomplete measured data and without spurious modes, Syst. Signal Process. 21(7) (2007) 2715–2731.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2007.03.001

[16] X. Mao, H. Dai, Finite element model updating with positive definiteness and no spillover, Mech. Syst. Signal Process. 28 (2012) 387–398.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2011.11.002