Comparison of PSO, AGA, SA and Memetic Algorithms for Surface Grinding Optimization

Article Preview

Abstract:

In striving to remain competitive in the global market, the concept of optimization of manufacturing processes has been extensively employed to meet the diverse production requirements. Optimization analysis of machining processes is usually based on either minimizing or maximizing certain objective functions. Recently, various non-traditional optimization techniques have evolved to optimize the process parameters of machining processes. The objective of this work is to study the effectiveness of the most commonly used non-traditional optimization methods as applied to a particular machining optimization problem. In this work, surface grinding processes are optimized using i) Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) ii) Adaptive Genetic Algorithm (AGA) iii) Simulated Annealing (SA) and iv) Memetic algorithm (MA). Memetic algorithm used here has two variations as MA-1 and MA-2, each having the combination of PSO and SA and AGA and SA respectively. The mathematical model of surface grinding operations was adopted from a literature. A computer program was written in Visual C++ for the optimization computations. The computation results of various optimization methods are compared and it is observed that the results of PSO method have outperformed the results of other methods in terms of the combined objective function (COF).

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

241-247

Citation:

Online since:

September 2016

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2016 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] K. Babu and T.S. Prasanna Kumar, Optimum CNT Concentration and Bath Temperature for Maximum Heat Transfer Rate during Quenching in CNT Nanofluids, J. of ASTM Intl., 9 (2012), # JAI104442.

DOI: 10.1520/stp156720120001

Google Scholar

[2] N. Baskar, P. Asokan, R. Saravanan and G. Prabaharan, Selection of optimal conditions in multi-pass face milling using non-conventional methods", Proc. of the 20th All India Manufacturing Technology, Design and Research Conference, (2002).

Google Scholar

[3] N. Baskar, P. Asokan, R. Saravanan and G. Prabaharan, Optimization of machining parameters of milling operations using particle swarm optimization algorithm, Proceedings of MOSIM, (2003).

Google Scholar

[4] X.M. Wen, A.A.O. Tay. And A.Y.C. Nee, Microcomputer based optimization of the surface grinding process, J. of Mater. Proc. Tech., 29 (1992), 75-90.

Google Scholar

[5] R. Saravanan, P. Asokan and M. Sachithanandam, A multi-objective genetic algorithm (GA) approach for optimization of surface grinding operations, J. of Machine Tools Manufacture. 42 (2002), 1327-1334.

DOI: 10.1016/s0890-6955(02)00074-3

Google Scholar

[6] K. Babu, N. Baskar, P. Asokan and R. Saravanan, Optimizing the process parameters of surface grinding operations - A Memetic approach, Proc. of Nat. Conf. on Advances in Materials and Manufacturing Technology, Apr 29-30, 2004, IIT Madras, Chennai.

Google Scholar

[7] K. Babu, N. Baskar, P. Asokan and R. Saravanan, Computerized optimization of process parameters for surface grinding operations using adaptive genetic algorithm (AGA), Proc. of Int. Conf. on Responsive Supply Chain (RSC-2004), Jan 4-6, CIT Coimbatore.

Google Scholar

[8] K. Babu, N. Baskar, P. Asokan and R. Saravanan, Multi-objective optimization of surface grinding operations using memetic algorithm", Proc. of Nat. conf. on Modeling and Analysis of Production Systems (MAPS-2004), Jan 22-23, NIT Trichy, pp.283-288.

Google Scholar

[9] K. Babu, N. Baskar, P. Asokan and R. Saravanan, (2004), Selection of optimum machining parameters for surface grinding operations using simulated annealing algorithm, J. of Manufacturing Technology Today, CMTI, Vol. 3 pp.12-18.

Google Scholar

[10] P. Asokan, N. Baskar, K. Babu, G. Prabhaharan, and R. Saravanan, Optimization of surface grinding operations using particle swarm optimization technique, J. of Manufac. Sci. and Engg., 127 (2005), pp.885-892.

DOI: 10.1115/1.2037085

Google Scholar