Cohesive Zone Modeling for 3D Ductile Crack Propagation

Article Preview

Abstract:

Computational modeling of three-dimensional crack propagation in very ductile materials is still a challenge in fracture mechanics analysis. In the present work a new stress-triaxiality-dependent cohesive zone model (TCZM) is proposed to describe elastic-plastic fracture process in full three-dimensional specimens. The cohesive parameters are identified as a function of the stress triaxiality from ductile fracture experiments. The predictions of TCZM show good agreement with the experimental results for both side-grooved C(T) specimen and rod bar specimen.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

132-136

Citation:

Online since:

September 2016

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2017 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Chen CR, Kolednik O. Comparison of cohesive zone parameters and crack tip stress states between two different specimen types. International Journal of Fracture 132(2005)135-152.

DOI: 10.1007/s10704-005-0626-2

Google Scholar

[2] Needleman A. A continuum model for void nucleation by inclusion debonding. Journal of Applied Mechanics 54(1987)525-531.

DOI: 10.1115/1.3173064

Google Scholar

[3] Needleman A. An analysis of decohesion along an imperfect interface. International Journal of Fracture 42(1990)21-40.

DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-2444-9_2

Google Scholar

[4] Scheider I, Brocks W. Simulation of cup-cone fracture using the cohesive model. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 70(2003)1943-(1962).

DOI: 10.1016/s0013-7944(03)00133-4

Google Scholar

[5] Lin G, Cornec A, Schwable KH. Three-dimensional finite element simulation of crack extension in aluminum alloy 2024FC. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures 21(1998)1159-1173.

DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-2695.1998.00096.x

Google Scholar

[6] Yuan H, Lin GY, Cornec A. Application of cohesive zone model for assessment of ductile fracture process. Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology 118(1996)192-200.

DOI: 10.1115/1.2804886

Google Scholar

[7] Siegmund T, Brocks W. A numerical study on the correlation between the work of separation and the dissipation rate in ductile fracture. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 67(2000)139-154.

DOI: 10.1016/s0013-7944(00)00054-0

Google Scholar

[8] Li H, Yuan H, Li X. Assessment of low cycle fatigue crack growth under mixed-mode loading conditions by using a cohesive zone model. International Journal of Fatigue 75(2015)39-50.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.01.008

Google Scholar

[9] Yuan H, Li X. Effects of the cohesive law on ductile crack propagation simulation by using cohesive zone models. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 126(2014)1-11.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.04.019

Google Scholar

[10] Kordisch H, Sommer E, Schmitt W. The influence of triaxiality on stable crack growth. Nuclear Engineering and Design 112(1989)27-35.

DOI: 10.1016/0029-5493(89)90142-8

Google Scholar

[11] Scheider I, Brocks W. Simulation of cup-cone fracture using the cohesive model. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 70(2003)1943-(1962).

DOI: 10.1016/s0013-7944(03)00133-4

Google Scholar

[12] Scheider I, Rajendran M, and Banerjee A. Comparison of different stress state dependent cohesive zone models applied to thin walled structures. Engineering Fracture Mechanics 78(2011)534-543.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2010.05.003

Google Scholar