Progressive Failure Analysis of Pipeline Repaired by Composite Wrapping

Article Preview

Abstract:

Composite overwrap systems have been widely used to repair damaged pipelines. Its effectiveness has been proven by many researches and engineering applications. However, the research on progressive failure mode of the repaired structure has not been reported. In the present paper, finite element method with Hashin failure criteria is developed to realize the progressive failure analysis. The predicted burst pressure is in good agreement with the burst experiment. Different from widely-reported failure progress in Composite Overwrapped Pressure Vessels (COPV), the progressive failure analysis for the defected pipeline overwrapped by composite reveals very different failure stages: stable failure propagation and rapid failure propagation. The identification of critical pressure between these two stages is valuable in composite reparation design for the defected pipeline.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

483-487

Citation:

Online since:

September 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2017 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Md Shamsuddoha, Md Mainul Islam. Effectiveness of Using Fibre-reinforced Polymer Composites for Underwater Steel Pipeline Repairs, J. Composite Structures, 2013, 100: 40-45.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.12.019

Google Scholar

[2] American Society of Mechanical Engineer, Repair of Pressure Equipment and Piping, ASME PCC-2 , S. (2009).

Google Scholar

[3] Toutanji H, Dempsey S. Stress Modeling of Pipelines Strengthened with Advanced Composites Materials, J. Thin-Walled Structures, 2001, 39(2): 153-165.

DOI: 10.1016/s0263-8231(00)00049-5

Google Scholar

[4] Freire J L F, Vieira R D, Diniz J L C. PART 7: Effectiveness of Composite Repairs Applied to Damaged Pipeline, J. Experimental Techniques. 2007, 31: 59-66.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-1567.2007.00243.x

Google Scholar

[5] Shuai Jian, Liu Wei, Li Jianfeng. Stress Analyses of Repaired Pipelines by Enwinding Composite Materials, J. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2013, 34(2): 372-379.

Google Scholar

[6] Duell J M, Wilson J M, Kessler M R. Analysis of a Carbon Composite Overwrap Pipeline Repair System, J. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 2008, 85(11): 782-788.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2008.08.001

Google Scholar

[7] Chi Seung Lee, Jeong Hyeon Kim, Seul Kee Kim. Initial and Progressive Failure Analyses for Composite Laminates Using Puck Failure Criterion and Damage-coupled Finite Element Method, J. Composite Structures, 2015, 121: 406-419.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.11.011

Google Scholar

[8] Liu P F, Zheng J Y. Progressive Failure Analysis of Carbon Fiber/epoxy Composite Laminates Using Continuum Damage Mechanics, J. Materials Science and Engineering A, 2008, 485: 711-717.

DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2008.02.023

Google Scholar

[9] Hashin Z. Failure criteria for unidirectional fiber composites, J. Journal of Applied Mechanics, 1980, 47(3): 29-34.

Google Scholar

[10] Wang Junjie, Jiang Jingmao. Study on dynamic simulation of roll forming of ERW pipes, J. Journal of Plasticity Engineering, 2007, 14(5): 23-25.

Google Scholar