[1]
J.L. Burbidge, 1963, Production flow analysis, Prod. Eng. 42 (1963) 742-752.
DOI: 10.1049/tpe.1963.0114
Google Scholar
[2]
J.R. King, Machine component grouping in production flow analysis: an approach using rank order clustering, Int. J. Prod. Res. 18 (1980) 213-232.
DOI: 10.1080/00207548008919662
Google Scholar
[3]
J.R. King, V. Nakornchai, Machine component group formation in group technology - review and extension, International Int. J. Prod. Res. 20 (1982) 117-133.
DOI: 10.1080/00207548208947754
Google Scholar
[4]
M.P. Chandrasekharan, R. Rajagopalan, ZODIAC-an algorithm for concurrent formation of part-families and machine-cells, Int. J. Prod. Res. 25 (1987) 835-850.
DOI: 10.1080/00207548708919880
Google Scholar
[5]
R.G. Askin, S.P. Subramanian, A cost based heuristic for group technology configuration, Int. J. Prod. Res. 25 (1987) 101-113.
Google Scholar
[6]
H. Chan, D. Milner, Direct clustering algorithm for group formation in cellular manufacturing, J. Manuf. Syst. 1 (1982) 65- 67.
Google Scholar
[7]
J. Wang, Formation of machine cells and part families in cellular manufacturing systems using a linear assignment algorithm, Automatica, 39 (2003) 1607-1615.
DOI: 10.1016/s0005-1098(03)00150-x
Google Scholar
[8]
F. Boctor, A linear formulation of the machine-part cell formation problem, Int. J. Prod. Res. 29 (1991) 343-356.
Google Scholar
[9]
C.H. Cheng, C.H. Goh, A. Lee, Designing group technology manufacturing systems using heuristic branching rules, Computers ind. Engng. 40 (2001) 117-131.
DOI: 10.1016/s0360-8352(00)00080-2
Google Scholar
[10]
A.M. Mukattash, M.B. Adil, K.K. Tahboub, Heuristic approaches foe part assignment in cell formation, Computers ind. Engng. 42 (2002) 329 - 341.
DOI: 10.1016/s0360-8352(02)00020-7
Google Scholar
[11]
A. Stawowy, Evolutionary strategy for manufacturing cell design, Int. J. Manag. Sci.: Omega, 34 (2006) 1 - 18.
Google Scholar
[12]
Y. Yin, K. Kazuhiko, Similarity coefficient methods applied to the cell formation problem: A taxonomy and review, Int. J. Prod. Econ. 101 (2006) 329 - 352.
Google Scholar
[13]
C. Baroni-Urban, M.W. Buser, Similarity of binary data, Syst. Zool. 25 (1976) 251-259.
Google Scholar
[14]
A. Kusiak, M. Cho, Similarity coefficient algorithm for solving the group technology problem, Int. J. Prod. Res. 30 (1992) 2633-2646.
DOI: 10.1080/00207549208948181
Google Scholar
[15]
C.K. Kumar, M.P. Chandrasekharan, Grouping efficacy: a quantitative criterion for goodness of block diagonal forms of binary matrices in group technology, Int. J. Prod. Res. 28 (1990) 233-243.
DOI: 10.1080/00207549008942706
Google Scholar
[16]
P.H. Waghodekar, S. Sahu, Machine-component cell formation in group technology MACE, Int. J. Prod. Res. 22 (1984) 937-948.
DOI: 10.1080/00207548408942513
Google Scholar
[17]
H. Seifoddini, Single linkage versus average linkage clustering in machine cells formation applications, Computers ind. Engng. 16 (1989) 419–426.
DOI: 10.1016/0360-8352(89)90160-5
Google Scholar
[18]
C.T. Mosier, L. Taube, The facts of group technology and their impact on implementation, OMEGA, 13 (1985) 381–391.
Google Scholar
[19]
R.G. Askin, S. Subramanian, A cost-based heuristic for group technology configuration, Int. J. Prod. Res. 25 (1987) 101–113.
Google Scholar