Cell Formation and Part Family Identification by Using Traditional Methods

Article Preview

Abstract:

A Combined Algorithm is proposed to form the machine cell and part family identification in the cellular manufacturing system. In the first phase, part families identification, by using Rank Order Clustering (ROC) and Modified Single Linkage Clustering (MOD-SLC). In second phase, Machine cell formation, by using Rank Order Clustering (ROC) and Modified Single Linkage Clustering (MOD-SLC), which is to assign machines into machine cells to produce part families. The above Proposed method is tested by using standard problems and compared with other method results for the same standard problems. Grouping efficiency is one of the most widely used measures of quality for Cellular Manufacturing Systems.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

121-126

Citation:

Online since:

October 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2017 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] J.L. Burbidge, 1963, Production flow analysis, Prod. Eng. 42 (1963) 742-752.

DOI: 10.1049/tpe.1963.0114

Google Scholar

[2] J.R. King, Machine component grouping in production flow analysis: an approach using rank order clustering, Int. J. Prod. Res. 18 (1980) 213-232.

DOI: 10.1080/00207548008919662

Google Scholar

[3] J.R. King, V. Nakornchai, Machine component group formation in group technology - review and extension, International Int. J. Prod. Res. 20 (1982) 117-133.

DOI: 10.1080/00207548208947754

Google Scholar

[4] M.P. Chandrasekharan, R. Rajagopalan, ZODIAC-an algorithm for concurrent formation of part-families and machine-cells, Int. J. Prod. Res. 25 (1987) 835-850.

DOI: 10.1080/00207548708919880

Google Scholar

[5] R.G. Askin, S.P. Subramanian, A cost based heuristic for group technology configuration, Int. J. Prod. Res. 25 (1987) 101-113.

Google Scholar

[6] H. Chan, D. Milner, Direct clustering algorithm for group formation in cellular manufacturing, J. Manuf. Syst. 1 (1982) 65- 67.

Google Scholar

[7] J. Wang, Formation of machine cells and part families in cellular manufacturing systems using a linear assignment algorithm, Automatica, 39 (2003) 1607-1615.

DOI: 10.1016/s0005-1098(03)00150-x

Google Scholar

[8] F. Boctor, A linear formulation of the machine-part cell formation problem, Int. J. Prod. Res. 29 (1991) 343-356.

Google Scholar

[9] C.H. Cheng, C.H. Goh, A. Lee, Designing group technology manufacturing systems using heuristic branching rules, Computers ind. Engng. 40 (2001) 117-131.

DOI: 10.1016/s0360-8352(00)00080-2

Google Scholar

[10] A.M. Mukattash, M.B. Adil, K.K. Tahboub, Heuristic approaches foe part assignment in cell formation, Computers ind. Engng. 42 (2002) 329 - 341.

DOI: 10.1016/s0360-8352(02)00020-7

Google Scholar

[11] A. Stawowy, Evolutionary strategy for manufacturing cell design, Int. J. Manag. Sci.: Omega, 34 (2006) 1 - 18.

Google Scholar

[12] Y. Yin, K. Kazuhiko, Similarity coefficient methods applied to the cell formation problem: A taxonomy and review, Int. J. Prod. Econ. 101 (2006) 329 - 352.

Google Scholar

[13] C. Baroni-Urban, M.W. Buser, Similarity of binary data, Syst. Zool. 25 (1976) 251-259.

Google Scholar

[14] A. Kusiak, M. Cho, Similarity coefficient algorithm for solving the group technology problem, Int. J. Prod. Res. 30 (1992) 2633-2646.

DOI: 10.1080/00207549208948181

Google Scholar

[15] C.K. Kumar, M.P. Chandrasekharan, Grouping efficacy: a quantitative criterion for goodness of block diagonal forms of binary matrices in group technology, Int. J. Prod. Res. 28 (1990) 233-243.

DOI: 10.1080/00207549008942706

Google Scholar

[16] P.H. Waghodekar, S. Sahu, Machine-component cell formation in group technology MACE, Int. J. Prod. Res. 22 (1984) 937-948.

DOI: 10.1080/00207548408942513

Google Scholar

[17] H. Seifoddini, Single linkage versus average linkage clustering in machine cells formation applications, Computers ind. Engng. 16 (1989) 419–426.

DOI: 10.1016/0360-8352(89)90160-5

Google Scholar

[18] C.T. Mosier, L. Taube, The facts of group technology and their impact on implementation, OMEGA, 13 (1985) 381–391.

Google Scholar

[19] R.G. Askin, S. Subramanian, A cost-based heuristic for group technology configuration, Int. J. Prod. Res. 25 (1987) 101–113.

Google Scholar