Study of Post-Tensioned and Reinforced Masonry Walls under Lateral Loads

Article Preview

Abstract:

Moderate to strong earthquakes can cause considerable damage to masonry walls which are primary structural elements for decades. In previous earthquakes, a large number of masonry walls failed due to insufficient shear strength with excessive in-plane deformation, or due to insufficient out-of- plane bending capacity of the walls in the perpendicular direction. Typically, out-of- plane failure is far more prevalent and happens earlier than in-plane failure in most past earthquakes. Thus their arises the need to strengthen this masonry walls. Generally, the compressive forces that masonry walls bear vary at different storey’s vary , therefore, walls at lower storey’s can only be applied with relatively smaller prestress due to already higher compression stresses produced by self-weight and floor dead load. Many strengthening methodsSuch as using NSM-CFRP, post tensioning, shortcreting etc. are excellent methods of strengthening masonry walls. In this the performance of post tensioned and reinforced masonry walls is analyzed. Ungrouted, partially grouted, and fully grouted Post Tensioned [PT] Masonry Walls exhibit different behavior and failure mechanisms. For this an analytical model based on an experimental study is prepared and their results are compared with ABAQUS.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

267-272

Citation:

Online since:

November 2016

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2017 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Reza H,A. Mohamed; and E. Julie, (2015) Strength and Seismic Performance Factor of Posttensioned Masonry Walls, Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 140., No. 3.

Google Scholar

[2] Dongun . R; C. Anil; A. Mohamed and M. Madurapperuma, (2014) Effects of Tendon Spacing on In-Plane Behavior ofPost tensioned Masonry Walls, Journal of Structural Engineering, 81, 362-376.

Google Scholar

[3] Bonett R. and Ureggo H. (2005) Post Tensioned concrete brick masonry without masonry joints. 14th World conference on Earth quake Engineering, 162, 1-14.

Google Scholar

[4] Owen A. and J Mervyn (2004) Reversed In-Plane cyclic behavior of Post Tensioned Clay Brick Masonry, Journal of Structural Engineering, 130, 1233-1242.

Google Scholar

[5] El Gawady A, Ryu d. and Wijeyewickrema, (2014) Seismic Behaviour of unbonded Post-Tensioned Masonry Walls", Tenth U.S. National conference for Earthquake Engineering, 130, 1-11.

Google Scholar

[6] Tande S. and M Reshama, (2013) Performance Based Inelastic Seismic analysis of Buildings, International Journal of Latest Trends in Engineering and Technology, 2, 380-390.

Google Scholar

[7] Bakshi A and B. Aslani, (2012) Study on Response Modification Factor for stiffened steel shear wall systems, 15WCEe, LISBOA.

Google Scholar

[8] Wight D., and M. Jaison, (2008) Tendon stress in Unbonded post tensioned masonry walls at Nominal In-Plane strength, Journal of Structural Engineering, 134, 938-946.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(2008)134:6(938)

Google Scholar

[9] H. Derakhshan, M. Dizhur, M Griffith and J Ingham(2014). InSitu Out-of-Plane Testing of as-Built and Retrofitted Unreinforced Masonry Walls, Journal of Structural Engineering, 140, 1-24.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0000960

Google Scholar

[10] Tondelli, Marco; Beyer and Katrin (2014) Observations on out-of-plane behaviour of URM walls in buildings with RC slabs, 9th International Masonry Conference, Guimaraes.

DOI: 10.1002/eqe.2710

Google Scholar

[11] M.J. N Priestley(1985) Seismic Behaviour of Unreinforced Masonry Walls, Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering, 18, 191-205.

DOI: 10.5459/bnzsee.18.2.191-205

Google Scholar

[12] B. Mohammad,A. Ahmad, C. Alan and Franklin Moon(2015) Simplified micro modeling of partially grouted masonry assemblages, Construction 83, 159–173.

DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.021

Google Scholar

[13] NZS 4230: 1990, Code of practice for Design of Masonry Structures, Standard Association of Newzealand, Willington.

Google Scholar

[14] MSJC, Building code requirement for Masonry Structures, ACI 530/ASCE 5/TMS 602, Masonry Standards Joint Committee, USA (2002).

DOI: 10.14359/1541

Google Scholar

[15] Ingham J. M ., Davidson B.J., Brammer D.R. and Voon K.C. (2001) Testing and codification of partially grout filled Nominally-reinforced concrete masonry subjected to cyclic loading, The masonry society journal, 19, 83-96.

Google Scholar