A Comparative Assessment of Diffuse Fraction Models

Abstract:

Many building performance applications (energy use, solar gains, thermal comfort, renewable energy systems, daylight, etc.) require information about both direct and diffuse components of the incident solar radiation. However, most meteorological stations only monitor global horizontal irradiance. Consequently, multiple methods have been proposed in the past to derive from measured global horizontal irradiance data the diffuse fraction. Thereby, additional data regarding other parameters such as clearness index, solar altitude, air mass, and turbidity are used. Given the importance of this procedure for the down the line tools, its reliability represents a critical issue. To address this point, we pursued an empirical approach. A number of existing methods for the computation of the diffuse fraction were selected. Actual measurements of global and diffuse irradiance were obtained for seven locations in USA and one location in Austria. The measured global irradiance data for these locations were fed to the aforementioned diffuse fraction models. The calculation results were then compared with the corresponding empirical data. The comparative assessment yielded a number of findings. The relative performance ("ranking") of the models was found to be more or less consistent across the different locations. However, none of the models can be said to be performing wholly satisfactory. For instance, the best performing model displayed only in 45 to 65 percentage of the cases relative errors less than 20%. In case of the worst performing model, the percentage of the cases for which relative errors were less than 20% was even smaller, namely 30% to 60%.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volume 861)
• Pages: 509-515
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.861.509
• Online since: December 2016
• Authors: Ehsan Vazifeh*, Matthias Schuss, Ardeshir Mahdavi
• Keywords: Diffuse Fraction Models, Performance Simulation, Solar Radiation

References

[1] B.Y.H. Liu and R.C. Jordan, The interrelationship and characteristic distribution of direct, diffuse and total solar radiation, Sol. Energy 4 (1960) p.1–9.

DOI: 10.1016/0038-092x(60)90062-1

[2] D.G. Erbs, S.A. Klein and J.A. Duffie, Estimation of the diffuse radiation fraction for hourly, daily and monthly-average global radiation, Sol. Energy 28 (1982) pp.293-302.

DOI: 10.1016/0038-092x(82)90302-4

[3] J.W. Spencer, A comparison of methods for estimating hourly diffuse solar radiation from global solar radiation, Sol. Energy 29 (1982) pp.19-32.

DOI: 10.1016/0038-092x(82)90277-8

[4] J. Boland, L. Scott and M. Luther, Modelling the diffuse fraction of global solar radiation on a horizontal surface, Environmetrics 12 (2001) pp.103-116.

DOI: 10.1002/1099-095x(200103)12:2<103::aid-env447>3.0.co;2-2

[5] S. Dervishi and A. Mahdavi, Computing diffuse fraction of global horizontal solar radiation: A model comparison, Sol. Energy 86 (2012) pp.1796-1802.

DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2012.03.008

[6] E. Vazifeh, S. Dervishi, A. Mahdavi, Calculation models for the diffuse fraction of global solar radiation, Proceedings of the second CESBP, Vienna, 2013, pp.587-590.

[7] G. König-Langlo and R. Sieger, BSRN-Archive Overview and Status, Twelfth BSRN Scientific Review and Workshop, AWI Potsdam, Postdam, (2012).

[8] CIE [ed. ] – Guide to Recommended Practice of Daylight Measurement, Commission Internationale de l'Eclairage, Vienna, (1994).

[9] E.L. Maxwell, A quasi-physical model for converting hourly global horizontal to direct normal insolation. Report SERI/TR-215-3087, Solar Energy Institute, Golden, (1987).

[10] A. Skartveit and J.A. Olseth, A model for the diffuse fraction of hourly global radiation, Sol. Energy 38 (1987) p.271–274.

DOI: 10.1016/0038-092x(87)90049-1

[11] D.T. Reindl, W.A. Beckman and J.A. Duffie, Diffuse fraction correlations, Sol. Energy 45 (1990) p.1–7.

DOI: 10.1016/0038-092x(90)90060-p

[12] R. Perez, P. Ineichen, E. Maxwell, R. Seals and A. Zelenka, Dynamic global-to-direct irradiance conversion models, ASHRAE Transactions 98 (1992) p.354–369.

[13] J. Boland, B. Ridley and B. Brown. Models of diffuse solar radiation, Renew. Energ. 33 (2008) pp.575-584.

DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2007.04.012

[14] P. Lauret, J. Boland and B. Ridley. Derivation of a solar diffuse fraction model in a Bayesian framework, Case Studies in Business, Industry and Government Statistics 3 (2010) p.108–122.

[15] A. Skartveit and J.A. Olseth. An hourly diffuse fraction model with correction for variability and surface albedo, Sol. Energy 63 (1998) p.173–183.

DOI: 10.1016/s0038-092x(98)00067-x

[16] F. Kasten. A simple parameterization of the Pyrheliometer formula for determining the Linke turbidity factor, Meteorol. Rdsch. 33 (1980) pp.124-127.

[17] MATLAB version 8. 4. 0. 150421. Natick, Massachusetts: The MathWorks Inc., (2014).

[18] I. Reda and A. Andreas, Solar Position Algorithm for Solar Radiation Applications, NREL Report No. TP-560-34302, Golden, (2003).

[19] Information on https: /thiesclima. com.

[20] Information on https: /www. google. de/maps.