Using Analytic Hierarchy Process to Optimize PESTEL Scenario Analysis Tool in Huge Construction Projects

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper uses the Analytic Hierarchy Process to optimize the PESTEL analysis. The scenario: pre-construction and assembly factors of huge civil engineering construction projects. Several managers use too many criteria to evaluate large projects. It suggests that there may be few important criteria that summarize the manager's preference. To demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed hypothesis, the authors prepared a qualitative and exploratory study. Conclusions are based on the judgment of an expert interviewed. As expected, the hypothesis was considered plausible. Two main criteria corresponded to 71% of the expert's preference. The result resembles a Pareto distribution.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

707-712

Citation:

Online since:

June 2017

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2017 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] A. Twort, G. Rees, Civil engineering project management, Elsevier (2003).

Google Scholar

[2] G. PMBOK, A Guide to Project Management Knowledge, PMI (2013).

Google Scholar

[3] Ians, India to Get $250 Million for Renewables From BRICS New Development Bank, The New Indian Press, Business (april 15th, 2016).

Google Scholar

[4] A. Campos, M. Rodrigues, Infrastructure is worst in Bric, research shows, State of São Paulo, Economy and Business Report (april 26th, 2013).

Google Scholar

[5] E. P. Cruz, C. R. Barreto, C. N. Fontanillas, The Decisional Process Organizations, Intersaberes, Paraná, (2014).

Google Scholar

[6] G. Natario, Group calls for immediate resumption of works at COMPERJ, ALERJ - Legislative Assembly of the State of Rio de Janeiro, News. (June 7th, 2016).

Google Scholar

[7] C. N. Fontanillas, An analysis of the oil production chain from the application of the AHP / FUZZY method to the PESTAL model from the perspective of oil experts, COPPE-UFRJ Production Engineering Doctoral Thesis, Rio de Janeiro (2016).

Google Scholar

[8] M. E. Porter, Competitive Strategy, Free Press, New York (1980).

Google Scholar

[9] H. A. Simon, Administrative behavior, New York, Free Press (1965).

Google Scholar

[10] T. L. Saaty, Hierarchical Analysis Method, São Paulo, McGraw – Hill (1991).

Google Scholar

[11] E. G. Gomes, M. P. E. Lins, J. C. C. B. Soares de Mello, Selection of the best municipality, GIS-Multicriteria integration, Operat. Res. J. 22(1) (2002) 59-85.

Google Scholar

[12] H. G. Costa, Introduction to the Hierarchical Analysis Method, Niterói, RJ, Brasil, Helder Gomes Costa (2002).

Google Scholar

[13] B. Roy, The outranking approach and the foundations of ELECTRE methods, Theory and Decision, 31 (1991) 49-73.

DOI: 10.1007/bf00134132

Google Scholar