Performance Index for Rehabilitating Water Distribution Networks

Article Preview

Abstract:

Municipalities in Canada have noted that 59% of their water systems need repair, and the condition of 43% of those systems is apparently intolerable. Hence, large volumes of rehabilitation projects are necessary to improve the performance of Canadian water systems. A reliability (R) and criticality index (CI) are crucial for prioritizing rehabilitation activities and distribute budgets efficiently. “R”is a function of failure rate, while“CI”is a function of economic, operational, social, and environmental factors. The research presented in this paper aimed to develop a performance index (PI) that considered the combination of “R” and “CI” for water networks. Sound techniques were utilized to generate the PImathematical model, such as reliability theory, simple multi-attribute rating technique (SMART), and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Data on water networks were collected from the city of Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. Four sub-networks were selected from the entire network to represent four types of land uses; undeveloped, residential, park, and commercial/industrial. The results showed that the PI value was 0.72, 0.93, 0.87, and 0.76 for these types of land uses, respectively. The developed models and tools are assumed to be beneficial for municipal engineers and managers as well as academics.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

176-192

Citation:

Online since:

November 2017

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2017 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] NRC. Deterioration and Inspection of Water Distribution Systems, A Best Practice by the National Guide to Sustainable Municipal Infrastructure, NRC, Canada, Issue 1. 0, September (2002).

Google Scholar

[2] F. Grablutz, S. Hanneken, Economic Modeling for Prioritizing Pipe Replacement Program, St. Louis County Water Company, USA (2000).

Google Scholar

[3] G. Loganathan, S. Park, N. Agbenowosi, H. Sherali, A Threshold Break Rate for Scheduling Optimal Pipeline Replacement, ASCE-World Water Congress (2001).

DOI: 10.1061/40569(2001)407

Google Scholar

[4] Y. Wang, Deterioration and Condition Rating Analysis of Water Mains, M.A.S. c. Thesis, Department of Building, Civil, and Environmental Engineering, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada (2006).

Google Scholar

[5] H. Al Barqawi, T. Zayed, Condition Rating Models for Underground Infrastructure: Sustainable Water Mains, J. Perform. Constr. Facil. 20(2) (2006) 126-135.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0887-3828(2006)20:2(126)

Google Scholar

[6] M. Fahmy, Integrated Multiple-Sensor Methodology for Condition Assessment of Water Mains, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Building, Civil, and Environmental Engineering, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada (2010).

Google Scholar

[7] Z. Geem, Window- Based Decision Support System for the Water Pipe Condition Assessment using Artificial Neural Network, ASCE-Conference Proceeding, World Water, and Environmental Resources Congress (2003).

DOI: 10.1061/40685(2003)147

Google Scholar

[8] K. Shahata Y. Zayed, Simulation as a Tool for Life Cycle Cost Analysis, Proceedings of Winter Simulation Conference, pp.2497-2503, Austin, Texas, USA (2008).

DOI: 10.1109/wsc.2008.4736359

Google Scholar

[9] A. Al-Aghbar. Automated Selection of Trenchless Technology for Rehabilitation of Water Mains, M.A. Sc. Thesis, Department of Building, Civil, and Environmental Engineering, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada (2005).

Google Scholar

[10] R. Ramakumar, Engineering Reliability, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey. USA (1993).

Google Scholar

[11] K. Govil, Reliability Engineering, Tata McGraw-Hill, New Delhi, India (1983).

Google Scholar

[12] J. Cullinane, Determining availability and reliability for water distribution systems, Reliab. Anal. Water Distribut. Syst. 1 (1989) 190-224.

Google Scholar

[13] Y. Kleiner, B. Rajani, Forecasting variations and trends in water-main breaks, J. Infrastruct. Syst. 8(4) (2002) 122–131.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1076-0342(2002)8:4(122)

Google Scholar

[14] R. Quimpo, Measure of Water Distribution System Reliability, ASCE-Risk-Based Dec. Mak. Water Res. 7 (1996) 388-395.

Google Scholar

[15] R. Billinton, R. Allan, Reliability Evaluation of Engineering Systems, Plenum Press, NY, USA (1983).

Google Scholar

[16] UMA Engineering Ltd. (AECOM). Water Main Management Framework: technical report, UMA Engineering Ltd. (AECOM), Mississauga, Ontario, Canada (2008).

Google Scholar

[17] S. Miles, F. Styers, C. Nesbit, Best Results –A Case Study Using Condition and Criticality Criteria, Advances, and Experiences with Trenchless Pipeline Projects, ASCE-Pipelines (2007).

DOI: 10.1061/40934(252)72

Google Scholar

[18] A. Salman, K. Bainbridge, K. Shahata, M. Zantingh, S. Sidawi, H. Krinas, G. Illaszewicz, J. Atherton, Risk Management Strategy for Water Distribution Networks, Ontario Water Works Association Conference, Windsor, Ontario, Canada, May 2-5 (2010).

Google Scholar

[19] D. Backer, et al. Guidebook to Decision-Making Methods. Department of Energy, USA. (http: /emi-web. inel. gov/Nissmg/Guidebook_2002. pdf) (2001).

Google Scholar

[20] T. L. Saaty, Decision Making for Leaders: The Analytic Hierarchy Process for Decisions in a Complex World. RWS Publications, California, USA (2001).

Google Scholar

[21] T. Zayed, D. Halpin, Quantitative assessment for piles productivity factors. ASCE- J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 130(3) (2004) 405-414.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9364(2004)130:3(405)

Google Scholar

[22] T. Zayed, L. Chang, Prototype Model for Build Operate Transfer (BOT) Risk Assessment. J. Manag. Eng. ASCE, 18(1) (2002) 7-16.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0742-597x(2002)18:1(7)

Google Scholar

[23] F. Lootsma, Fuzzy logic for planning and decision Making. Dordrechet, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers (1997).

Google Scholar

[24] T. Zayed, A. Salman, I. Basha, The Impact on Environment of Underground Infrastructure Utility Work. J. Struct. Infrastruct. Eng. UK. 7(3) (2011) 199-210.

DOI: 10.1080/15732470802445310

Google Scholar

[25] A. Salman, T. Zayed, O. Moselhi, Reliability Assessment of Water Distribution Network, No-Dig Conference, Toronto, Canada (2009).

Google Scholar

[26] A. Salman, Reliability-Based Management of Water Distribution Networks, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Building, Civil, and Environmental Engineering, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada (2011).

Google Scholar

[27] City of Hamilton website, http: /www. hamilton. ca/CityDepartments/PublicWorks/ WaterAndWasteWaterDev/, accessed on March 10th (2010).

Google Scholar