Implementation of Life Cycle Assessment Method (LCA) and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to Determine the Development of Recycling Unit of Waste Water in Grati CCPP PT Indonesia Power up Perak Grati

Article Preview

Abstract:

Waste water result from operating activities of Grati Combined Cycled Power Plant (CCPP) is significant amount and has potentially to be reutilized. A recycling unit as the pilot project has been applied in Grati CCPP PT Indonesia Power UP Perak Grati for capacity 4 tons/hour of service water product. Development plant of Grati CCPP up to year 2018 will produce more amounts of waste water, and potentially increase the pollution load in the unit area.Considering the use of alternative development for unit recycled waste water effluent from the Waste Water Treatment Plant (WWTP) has implications to the environmental and cost aspects, therefore a proper assessment to decide the alternative is needed. Proposed method of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is to measure the impact to the environment. And the Cost Benefit Analysis (CBA) is to measure the economic criteria. To integrate the results of the two methods, it is used and calculated by using Hierarcy Analytical Process (AHP).The result of the study about the environmental impact and economic analysis, the development of the recycling unit is required to process all waste water produced by power plants. Focus group by experts in power plant operation using AHP is based on the results of SimaPro 7.0 and CBA. The most beneficial result is with a single score of 0.2314 Pt / 1 ton of water service, the payback period of 2.5 years, 37.5% IRR and NPV US$ 88,577.23 and the MMF-RO unit for total capacity of 14 tons/hour has become the most alternative of development.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

18-26

Citation:

Online since:

January 2018

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2018 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] B.B. Stanley, H.A. Geoffrey, Foundations of Financial Management, McGraw-Hill Irwin, 10th edition, (2002).

Google Scholar

[2] Buyukkamaci, Life cycle assessment apllications in waste water treatment, Pollution Effects & Control, Turkey, (2013).

Google Scholar

[3] U. Ciptomulyono, D. Hajar, Metode Life Cycle Assesment dan Analytical Hierarchy Process untuk Pemilihan Alternatif Perbaikan Kinerja Lingkungan Produk Lampu Berbasis SimaPro-5, (2008).

Google Scholar

[4] Ll. Corominas, J. Foley, J.S. Guest, A. Hospido, H.F. Larsen, S. Morera, A. Shaw, Life cycle assessment applied to waste water treatment: state of the art, Water Research (2003) 1-13.

DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2013.06.049

Google Scholar

[5] L.P. Guereca, A. Musharrafie, E. Martinez, A. Padilla, J.M. Morgan, R.A. Noyola, A comparative life cycle assesment of a waste water treatment technology considering two inflow scale, (2013).

Google Scholar

[6] ISO (International Organization for Standardization), ISO 14042, Environmental management-life cycle assessment-life cycle impact assessment, (1997).

DOI: 10.3403/02947441u

Google Scholar

[7] R.L. Lestari, Life Cycle Assesment of Sugar from Sugarcane: A case study in Indonesia, Tesis Master, Asian Institute of Technology, Thailand, (2013).

Google Scholar

[8] A.P. Machado, L. Urbano, A.G. Brito, P. Janknecht, J.J. Salas, R. Nogueira, Life cycle assesment of waste water options for small and decentralized communities, Water Science & Technology, Vol 56, No. 3 (2007) 15-22.

DOI: 10.2166/wst.2007.497

Google Scholar

[9] Sound Resource Management Group Inc., Environmental Life Cycle Assesment of Waste Management Strategies with a Zero Waste Objective, Belkorp Environmental Services Inc., Vancouver, (2009).

Google Scholar

[10] T. Saaty, Decision Making for Leaders, The Analytical Hierarchyc Process, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh, (1993).

Google Scholar

[11] SimaPro Database Manual Methods Library, version 2. 9, (2016).

Google Scholar