Characterization of Noise in Eating Establishments Based on Psychoacoustic Parameters

Article Preview

Abstract:

Noise in eating establishments has been studied in architectural acoustics literature. For evaluating acoustics in these spaces, researchers predominantly investigate sound pressure levels and reverberation times. Yet, noise in eating spaces originate from a wide variety of sources and is hard to describe and evaluate with only sound pressure levels and reverberation times. Better metrics for acoustics in closed public spaces are needed. Psychoacoustic parameters of loudness, sharpness, fluctuation strength and roughness are promising metrics that have been used by many recent studies evaluating noise annoyance. However, unlike the established metrics such as reverberation time, no set of recommended values exist for these parameters, yet. The aim of this study is to investigate noise in eating establishments through psychoacoustic parameters and understand both the noise characteristics and the metrics themselves. This paper presents a set of sound recordings during lunch hours in two eating spaces in Izmir Institute of Technology. The entry and egress of occupants have been tracked manually, while sound levels have been measured and the noise has been recorded for psychoacoustics analysis. The relationship between the number of occupants and psychoacoustic parameters has been investigated through these objective measurements. The relationship between the number of occupants and sound levels is discussed in the light of the Lombard effect.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

539-546

Citation:

Online since:

January 2019

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2019 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] J. Kang, K. Chourmouziadou, K. Sakantamis, B. Wang, Y. Hao (Eds.), COST Action TD0804: Soundscape of European Cities and Landscapes, COST, Oxford, (2013).

Google Scholar

[2] J. Kang, B. Schulte-Fortkamp (Eds.), Soundscape and the Built Environment, Taylor & Francis, Florida, (2016).

Google Scholar

[3] M. Soyer, C. Houdet, Reduction of acoustic annoyance in school dining halls, The Journal of Auditory Research 26 (1986) 191-196.

Google Scholar

[4] A. Astolfi, M. Filippi, Good acoustical quality in restaurants: a compromise between speech intelligibility and privacy, Proceedings of ICA, Kyoto, (2004).

Google Scholar

[5] J. Kang, Acoustic quality in non-acoustic public buildings. Technical Acoustics 25-6 (2006) 513-522.

Google Scholar

[6] M. Hodgson, Z. Razavi, G. Steininger, Evaluation of acoustical environments in eating establishments, Building Acoustics 16-2 (2009) 125-148.

DOI: 10.1260/135101009788913239

Google Scholar

[7] J. H. Rindel, Acoustical capacity as a means of noise control in eating establishments, BNAM 2012 Joint Baltic-Nordic Acoustics Meeting, Odense, Denmark, (2012).

Google Scholar

[8] P. L. Battaglia, Achieving acoustical comfort in restaurants, Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics, 22-015001, (2014).

Google Scholar

[9] D. Svensson, C. Jeong, J. Brunskog, Acoustic comfort in eating establishments, Forum Acusticum 2014, Krakow, (2014).

Google Scholar

[10] L. Zelem, V. Chmelik, D. Urban, M. Rychtarikova, Analysis of the acoustic conditions in the student restaurant, Proceedings of EuroNoise 2015, Maastricht (2015) 1627-1631.

Google Scholar

[11] R. Watson, O. Downey, The Little Red Book of Acoustics, Blue Tree Acoustics, Sheffield, (2008).

Google Scholar

[12] Z. Razavi, Evaluation and Optimization of Acoustical Environments in Eating Establishments, Master Thesis, The University of Tehran, (2006).

Google Scholar

[13] H. Lazarus, Prediction of Verbal Communication is Noise— A review: Part 1., Applied Acoustics 19 (1986) 439-464.

DOI: 10.1016/0003-682x(86)90039-3

Google Scholar

[14] J. H. Rindel, Verbal communication and noise in eating establishments, Applied Acoustics 71 (2010) 1156–1161.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2010.07.005

Google Scholar

[15] International Commission for Acoustics, Psychoacoustic Basis of Sound Quality Evaluation section, Proceedings Book of ICA 2001, Rome, (2001).

Google Scholar

[16] M. Long, Architectural Acoustics (2nd ed.), Elsevier Academic Press, Oxford, (2014).

Google Scholar

[17] DIN 45631 Standard, Calculation of loudness level and loudness from the sound spectrum - Zwicker method - Amendment 1: Calculation of the loudness of time-variant sound, German Institute for Standardization, (2010).

Google Scholar

[18] ISO 532 Standard, Acoustics- Method for calculating loudness level, International Organization for Standardization, (1975).

Google Scholar

[19] ISO 532 Standard Draft, Acoustics- Methods for calculating loudness, International Organization for Standardization, (2016).

Google Scholar

[20] ANSI / ASA S3.4 Standard, American national standard procedure for the computation of loudness of steady sounds, American National Standards Institute, (2007).

Google Scholar

[21] H Fastl, E. Zwicker, Psychoacoustics: Facts and Models, (3rd ed.), Springer, New York, (2007).

Google Scholar

[22] S. S. Stevens, Calculation of the loudness of complex noise, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 28 (1956) 807-832.

Google Scholar

[23] B. C. J. Moore, B. R. Glasberg, T. Baer, A model for the prediction of thresholds, loudness and partial loudness. J. Audio Eng. Soc. 45 (1997) 224-240.

Google Scholar

[24] Information on http://www.bksv.com/library/dictionary.aspx.

Google Scholar

[25] DIN 45692 Standard, Measurement technique for the simulation of the auditory sensation of sharpness. German Institute for Standardization, (2009).

Google Scholar

[26] G. Von Bismarck, Sharpness as an attribute of the timbre of steady state sounds, Acustica 30 (1974) 159-172.

Google Scholar

[27] W. Aures, Berechnungsverfahren für den sensorischen Wohlklang beliebiger Schallsignale (A model for Calculating the Sensory Euphony of Various Sounds) Acustica 59 (1985) 130-141.

Google Scholar

[28] R. Sottek, Gehörgerechte Rauhigkeitsberechnung, DAGA 94, Dresden, (1994).

Google Scholar

[29] AMCA Publication 302, Application of sone ratings for non-ducted air moving devices, Air Moving and Conditioning Association, (1973).

Google Scholar

[30] P. Lindborg, Psychoacoustic, physical, and perceptual features of restaurants: A field survey in Singapore, Applied Acoustics 92 (2015) 47–60.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2015.01.002

Google Scholar

[31] N. M. Ortiz, B. Schulte-Fortkamp, Quiet-zones, is quiet" the correct identifier, in: J. Kang, K. Chourmouziadou, K. Sakantamis, B. Wang, Y. Hao (Eds.), COST Action TD0804: Soundscape of European Cities and Landscapes, COST, Oxford, 2013, pp.68-70.

Google Scholar

[32] P. N. Dökmeci, F. Aletta, M. Frost, I. Garcia, M. Galuszka, J. Kocinski, H. Lin, A. Mundt, M. Tomas, K. Genuit, B. Schulte-Fortkamp, COST Short term scientific mission: Training course on soundscape analysis: Soundwalk, recordings, analysis and listening tests, in: J. Kang, K. Chourmouziadou, K. Sakantamis, B. Wang, Y. Hao (Eds.), COST Action TD0804: Soundscape of European Cities and Landscapes, COST, Oxford, 2013, pp.224-227.

DOI: 10.1121/1.3384065

Google Scholar

[33] M. Mehta, J. Johnson, J. Rocafort, Architectural Acoustics: Principles and Design, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, (1999).

Google Scholar

[34] L. L. Beranek, Music, Acoustics & Architecture, John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York, (1962).

Google Scholar