Low Frequency Noise Level Assessment in Vienna

Article Preview

Abstract:

The present contribution reports on the results of sound level measurements in a number of locations in the city of Vienna, Austria. Thereby, a primary objective was to determine the degree to which the measurement results agree with corresponding information in the E.N.D. (Environmental Noise Directive 2002/49/EC) maps. Moreover, the relationship between the low-frequency segment of the acoustical exposure to the broad-band data was investigated. The results point to traffic as the main source of urban noise exposure. E.N.D. maps appear to provide a reasonable general overview of the urban noise circumstances. However, measurement results at individual locations can considerably deviate from E.N.D. data. Numeric values of low-frequency sound level range were found to be generally higher than those of the broad-frequency levels. The results revealed also a strong correlation between measurement-based L50R and NR (Noise Rating) values.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

547-552

Citation:

Online since:

January 2019

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2019 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Environmental Noise Directive of the European Parliament and Council, 25 June 2002, Directive 2002/49/EC.

Google Scholar

[2] Austrian Ministry of the Environment (Ministerium für ein lebenswertes Österreich), 2015, Noise Maps of Vienna, www.laerminfo.at/laermkarten/strassenverkehr.html.

Google Scholar

[3] N. Miller, US National Parks and management of park soundscapes. Applied Acoustics (2008), vol 69, no. 2.

Google Scholar

[4] C. W. Kosten and G. J. Van Os, Community reaction criteria for external noises. NPL Symposium 12: The Control of Noise (1962). London HMSO.

Google Scholar

[5] H. Miedema, C. Oudshoorn, Annoyance from transportation noise: Relationships with metrics DNL and DENL and their confidence intervals. Environmental Health (2001) vol. 109 (4).

DOI: 10.1289/ehp.01109409

Google Scholar