Using PERT to Optimise the Completion Time of Air-Conditioning and Mechanical Ventilation (ACMV) Project

Article Preview

Abstract:

An air-conditioning and mechanical ventilation (ACMV) construction project involved many interrelated construction activities with varying durations and multiple dependencies. This paper focuses on the development of a best possible project planning and scheduling technique that can help the project manager to manage and complete the ACMV project in optimal time. The program evaluation and review technique (PERT) is used in this research. The PERT technique helps to determine the probabilities of various stages of the project by specified deadlines and identify the activities on the critical path that have high potential for causing delays in the project completion time. The completion times of 72, 76, 79, and 80 weeks were taken for the PERT analysis. Deadline of 72 weeks is the contractual period of the ACMV project as specified in the contract. Completion time of 76 weeks is the critical path of the project as analyzed by the PERT technique. The deadline of 79 weeks is the proposed completion time for the ACMV project whereas 80 weeks are the actual completion date of the project. The PERT analysis revealed that the project completion time of 72 weeks, which is as stated in the contractual completion time, yielded the probability of completion of 2.67% only. This analysis shows that the contractual period is impossible to be achieved and it is an unrealistic time setting. Further negotiation is required including changing or extending of the contractual completion time. The other completion times are able to be achieved but the company may need to face the high penalty costs due to the delays in completion time.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

266-273

Citation:

Online since:

June 2019

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2019 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] A. Ahmadul, Refrigeration and Air Conditioning, Prentice-Hall of India Private Limited, (2006).

Google Scholar

[2] S. Katara, and S. Amponsah, Project Planning and Scheduling, the Critical Path Method Approach. BUI Power Project as a Case Study. International Journal of Science, 2 (2013), 33–41.

Google Scholar

[3] S. Zareei, Project Scheduling for Constructing Biogas Plant Using Critical Path Method. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 81 (2018), 756–759.

DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.08.025

Google Scholar

[4] N. Monjezi, M. J. Sheikhdavoodi and H. Basirzadeh, Application of Project Scheduling in Agriculture (Case Study : Mechanized Greenhouses Construction Project). Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology, 4 (2012), 241–244.

Google Scholar

[5] A. H. I. Lee, H.-Y. Kang, and T.-T Huang, Project Management Model for Constructing a Renewable Energy Plant. Procedia Engineering, 174 (2017), 145–154.

DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.01.186

Google Scholar

[6] W. Agyei, Project Planning and Scheduling Using PERT and CPM Techniques With Linear Programming: Case Study. International Journal Of Scientific & Technology Research, 4 (2015), 222–227.

Google Scholar

[7] W.A. Haga, K.A. Marold, A Simulation Approach to The PERT/CPM Time Cost Trade Off Problem. Project Management Journal, 35 (2004), 31–37.

DOI: 10.1177/875697280403500205

Google Scholar

[8] P. Ganame, P. Chaudhari, Construction Building Schedule Risk Analysis Using Monte-Carlo Simulation. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology, 2 (2015), 1402–1406.

Google Scholar

[9] V. Khodakarami, N. Fenton, N. Martin, Project Scheduling: Improved Approach to Incorporate Uncertainty Using Bayesian Networks. Project Management Journal, 38 (2007), 39–49.

DOI: 10.1177/875697280703800205

Google Scholar

[10] H. Ke, J. Ma, Modeling Project Time – Cost Trade-off in Fuzzy Random Environment. Applied Soft Computing, 19 (2014), 80–85.

DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2014.01.040

Google Scholar

[11] R. Y. Huang, K. S. Sun, System Development for Non-unit Based Repetitive Project Scheduling. Automation in Construction, 14 (2005), 650–665.

DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2005.02.003

Google Scholar

[12] E. Elbeltagi, M. Ammar, H. Sanad, M. Kassab, Overall Multi-objective Optimization of Construction Projects Scheduling Using Particle Swarm. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 23 (2016), 265–282.

DOI: 10.1108/ecam-11-2014-0135

Google Scholar

[13] M. Fisher, F. Aalami, Scheduling with Computer-interpretable Construction Method Models. Construction Engineering and Management, 122 (1996), 337–47.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9364(1996)122:4(337)

Google Scholar

[14] D. Gong, Optimization of Float Use in Risk Analysis-based Network Scheduling. International Journal Of Project Management, 15(1997), 187–92.

DOI: 10.1016/s0263-7863(95)00083-6

Google Scholar

[15] J. Heizer, B. Render, Operations Management, Sustainability and Supply Chain Management, 11th edition, Pearson Education Limited, (2014).

Google Scholar